Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BOGDANOVIĆ v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 72254/11 • ECHR ID: 001-115220

Document date: November 13, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

BOGDANOVIĆ v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 72254/11 • ECHR ID: 001-115220

Document date: November 13, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 72254/11 Savo BOGDANOVIĆ and others against Croatia lodged on 11 November 2011

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The applicants, Mr Milan Bogdan ović , Ms Rosa Bogdanović and Mr Savo Bogdanović are Croatian citizens of Serbian ethnic origin. They were born in 1950, 1952 and 1954 respectively and live in Bosanski Brod , Bosnia and Herzegovina . They are represented before the Court b y Mr L. Šušak , a lawyer practicing in Zagreb .

A. The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

1. Criminal Investigation

On 11 April 1994 the applicants ’ father Bogdan Bogdanović was killed in his house in Slavonski Brod in Croatia . The police lodged a criminal complaint on 22 May 1992 with the Požega County State Attorney ’ s Office. It appears that the investigation is still ongoing.

2. Civil proceedings

On an unspecified date the applicants brought a civil action against the State in the Zagreb Municipal Court, seeking compensation in connection with the death of their father. The claim was dismissed on 24 March 2006 and this judgment was upheld by the Zagreb County Court and the Supreme Court on 13 May 2008 and 9 June 2010, respectively. The national courts found that the claim had been submitted after the statutory limitation period had expired.

The applicants ’ subsequent constitutional complaint was dismisse d on 4 May 2011.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Article 2 of the Convention of the killing of their father. They also complain that the criminal law mechanisms as applied in the case at issue have not met the standards of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention.

They complain that their father was killed solely because of his Serbian origin and that, contrary to their procedural obligations under Article 14 of the Convention, the relevant authorities have failed to investigate the possibility of such a motive for his death.

Finally, they also complain under Article 6 of the Convention of the assessment of facts and interpretation of laws by the national courts as regards their civil action for damages.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life, was the manner in which the criminal law mechanisms have been applied in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention?

2 . Have the relevant authorities complied with their procedural obligation under Article 14 of the Convention to investigate whether there was any motive behind killings of the applicant ’ s father that might be related to his Serbian origin (see, mutatis mutandis , Å ečić v. Croatia , no. 40116/02, § 66 , ECHR 2007 ‑ VI ) ?

The Government are invited to submit copies of all case files and other documents concerning the killing of the applicants ’ father Bogdan Bogdanović .

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846