Communicated on 13 September 201 7 and 18 April 2018

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 14411/16 Igor OSKIRKO against Lithuania lodged on 9 March 2016

The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court ’ s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties , which is available in HUDOC.

QUESTIONS

1. Can the applicant still be considered a victim of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the decisions by the domestic courts finding violations of his rights in Lukiškės Remand Prison? ( see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania , nos. 40828/12 and 6 others , § 94, 8 December 2015)

2. In the affirmative, has the applicant been subjected to degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention due to the lack of proper partition between the sanitary facilities and the cell in Lukiškės Remand Prison? ( see Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 157, 10 January 2012, and the cases cited therein; Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia , no. 4265/06, § 53, 23 October 2012; Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, § 98, 4 October 2016; and Radzhab Magomedov v. Russia , no. 20933/08, § 54, 20 December 2016)

The Government is also requested to provide relevant information about the partition between the sanitary facilities and the cell in Lukiškės Remand Prison concerning the applicant.