Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF LEPOJIC v. SERBIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA
CASE OF KUNITSYNA v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
CASE OF ALIŠIĆ AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
CASE OF H. v. BELGIUMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 159/2008 of 21 February 2008 amending Regulations (EC) No 800/1999 and (EC) No 2090/2002 as regards physical checks carried out when agricultural products qualifying for refunds are exported
E.D.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission Directive 2006/136/EC of 11 December 2006 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include dinocap as active substance (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF KERN AGAINST AUSTRIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2006 of 12 January 2006 fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2093/2005
Council Regulation (EC) No 1349/2000 of 19 June 2000 establishing certain concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural products and providing for an adjustment, as an autonomous and transitional measure, of certain agricultural concessions provided for in the Europe Agreement with Estonia

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KUSIAK v. POLAND

Doc ref: 50424/99 • ECHR ID: 001-66648

Document date: September 21, 2004

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

I unique documents citing • X citations total to 6 paragraphs

Outbound citations

Z unique documents cited • n citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846