FARKAS v. HUNGARY
Doc ref: 63408/19 • ECHR ID: 001-206419
Document date: November 5, 2020
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 63408/19 Attila Csaba FARKAS against Hungary
( s ee appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5 November 2020 as a Committee composed of:
Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Wennerström , judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 November 2019,
Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant ’ s details are set out in the appended table.
The applicant was represented by Mr S. Schill , a lawyer practising in Budapest.
The applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”) .
THE LAW
Complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of criminal proceedings)
In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, the respondent Government cannot be held liable for the protraction of the case.
In particular, the Court notes that the domestic courts observed the undue length of the proceedings and provided redress, notably by taking this element into account as a mitigating factor when imposing imprisonment of seven years, as opposed to the relevant mean duration (ten years) of cumulative sentences in such cases of fraud.
In these circumstances, the Court is satisfied that the violation of the applicant ’ s Convention rights has been expressly acknowledged and adequately redressed. Consequently, the applicant can no longer claim to be a victim for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention.
In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Declares the application inadmissible.
Done in English and notified in writing on 26 November 2020 .
Liv Tigerstedt Krzysztof Wojtyczek Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
( excessive length of criminal proceedings )
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Year of birth
Representative ’ s name and location
Start of proceedings
End of proceedings
Total length
Levels of jurisdiction
63408/19
22/11/2019
Attila Csaba FARKAS
1975Schill Szabolcs
Budapest
31/03/2009
30/01/2020
10 year(s) and 10 month(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
