Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KARAPETYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LAZAROVA TRAJKOVSKA
CASE OF ORZECHOWSKI v. POLAND
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2594/93 of 22 September 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2293/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 with regard to the set-aside scheme referred to in Article 7
CASE OF AL-JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POALELUNGI
CASE OF DAVRAN AGAINST TURKEY
CASE OF HANDOLSDALEN SAMI VILLAGE AND OTHERS v. SWEDENPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE
E.N. v. IRELAND
CASE OF NOVAK v. SLOVENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER
CASE OF OSMANOĞLU v. TURKEYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TÜRMEN, VAJIĆ AND STEINER
CASE OF ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIAPARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE COSTA

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2010. Skatteministeriet v DSV Road A/S.

C-234/09 • 62009CJ0234 • ECLI:EU:C:2010:435

Inbound citations: 16
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 17

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

FW unique documents citing • Ji citations total to p paragraphs

Outbound citations

c unique documents cited • uT citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846