Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AKDENIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ
CASES OF DELBEC III, D.M., L.R. AND LAIDIN AGAINST FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 345/2004 of 26 February 2004 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
X, Y and Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF MR. H.G. SCHERMERS
CASE OF KOWALCZYK v. POLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVI Ć
CASE OF ASSOCIAZIONE POLITICA NAZIONALE LISTA MARCO PANNELLA v. ITALY
Regulation (EEC) No 2744/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the import and export system for products processed from cereals and from rice
FRIMU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA and 6 other applications
CASE OF LIA v. MALTA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
CASE OF BUSUTTIL v. MALTACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2009.

Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

C-540/07 • 62007CJ0540 • ECLI:EU:C:2009:717

Inbound citations: 51
•
Cited paragraphs: 26
•
Outbound citations: 26

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

lo unique documents citing • hn citations total to F4 paragraphs

Outbound citations

zh unique documents cited • Sb citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846