LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 32174/21, 33066/21, 33571/21, 35257/21, 35379/21, 36383/21, 36389/21, 36506/21, 37916/21, 38412/21, ... • ECHR ID: 001-230300
Document date: January 18, 2024
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 13
CASE OF YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 32174/21, 33066/21, 33571/21, 35257/21, 35379/21, 36383/21, 36389/21, 36506/21, 37916/21, 38412/21, ... • ECHR ID: 001-230300
Document date: January 18, 2024
Cited paragraphs only
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF YAKHNOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 32174/21 and 27 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Yakhnovets and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay , President , Gilberto Felici, Raffaele Sabato , judges ,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Conventionâ€) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Governmentâ€) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also, except for the fourth applicant, raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see KudreviÄius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey , no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic societyâ€.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia , nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, Butkevich v. Russia , no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia , nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; and Martynyuk v. Russia , no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges (code of administrative offences, CAO)
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
(in euros) [1]
32174/21
11/06/2021
Viktoriya Viktorovna YAKHNOVETS
1966
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Rostov-on-Don
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Rostov Regional Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Rostov Regional Court, 10/02/2021;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
33066/21
04/06/2021
1) Nikolay Yevgenyevich VOKUYEV
1986
2) Stanislav Mikhaylovich OKULOV
1984
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fines of RUB 10,000 for each of the applicants
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021 (first applicant) and
07/04/2021 (second applicant)
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021 and 07/04/2021.
3,500
to each applicant
33571/21
22/06/2021
Valeriya Mikhaylovna IVANOVA
1996
Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich
Velikiy Novgorod
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Velikiy Novgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Novgorod Regional Court
25/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 3.15 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Novgorod Regional Court, 25/02/2021.
4,000
35257/21
24/06/2021
Liliya Vasilyevna LOBKO
1940
Tykhta Vitaliy Dmitriyevich
Khabarovsk
Rally in support of Mr Furgal
Khabarovsk
09/11/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
24/12/2020
3,000
35379/21
16/06/2021
Aleksey Vladimirovich GRESKO
1974
Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich
Moscow
Meeting Mr Navalnyy at the Vnukovo Airport of Moscow
Moscow
17/01/2021
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
administrative detention for 12 days
Moscow City Court
20/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 6.10 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. on 17/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/02/2021
5,000
36383/21
30/06/2021
Nikita Igorevich CHESNOKOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Rostov-on-Don
31/01/2021
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
administrative detention for 3 days
Rostov Regional Court
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Rostov Regional Court, 28/04/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
36389/21
05/07/2021
Valentin Sergeyevich KVASHNIKOV
1978
Rally in support of Mr Furgal
Khabarovsk
23/07/2020
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
21/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Khabarovsk Regional Court, 21/01/2021 and 04/06/2021.
3,500
36506/21
27/06/2021
Vadim Vyacheslavovich ZUBKOV
1996
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 10.00 a.m. on 08/02/2021 until the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case on the same day,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 11/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
37916/21
16/07/2021
Olga Alekseyevna KOMOLOVA
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 7.50 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 14/04/2021,
4,000
38412/21
02/07/2021
Dmitriy Vladimirovich VILSHANSKIY
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 8.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
38516/21
14/07/2021
Boris Vladimirovich SARAPULOV
1957
Ivanets Vyacheslav Sergeyevich
Tbilisi, Georgia
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Irkutsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Irkutsk Regional Court
01/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Irkutsk Regional Court, 01/06/2021
3,500
38906/21
14/07/2021
Artur Igorevich SAYAPIN
1994
Bubon Konstantin Vladimirovich
Khabarovsk
Rally in support of Mr Furgal
Khabarovsk
25/08/2020
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for
2 days (enforced), changed later to a fine of RUB 10,000 (not paid)
Khabarovsk Regional Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from midnight on 04/09/2020 to 10.30 a.m. on 05/09/2020,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the administrative detention was enforced immediately after the decision of the first-instance court on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
38914/21
22/07/2021
Yegor Nikolayevich BELOV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/05/2021.
4,000
39896/21
27/07/2021
Pavel Nikolayevich LUSHAKOV
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from on 11.00 a.m. 02/02/2021 to 8.00 p.m. 03/02/2021, the applicant was not released after the administrative offence record had been compiled; complaint raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
40196/21
27/07/2021
Petr Aleksandrovich MAKAROV
2000
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 4.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
40444/21
27/07/2021
Sergey Yuryevich AFANASYEV
1965
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 3.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
40532/21
30/07/2021
Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV
1990
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Yaroslavl Regional Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case.
5,000
40877/21
02/08/2021
Klim Dmitriyevich BONDAR
2002
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 8 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021.
5,000
41620/21
06/08/2021
Sergey Nikolayevich OZEROV
1976
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 15 days
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.40 p.m. 31/01/2021 to midnight on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
42996/21
10/08/2021
Valentina Yevgenyevna VOLKOVA
1978
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich
Chelyabinsk
Collective recording a video petition to the US President and the world community regarding the poor ecological conditions
Chelyabinsk
12/12/2020
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Chelyabinsk Regional Court
10/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Chelyabinsk Regional Court, 10/02/2021.
3,500
43200/21
11/08/2021
Roman Alekseyevich ZHURAVLEV
1995
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kazan
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 4.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 2.30 p.m. on 24/01/2021
4,000
43242/21
09/08/2021
Viktor Yuryevich YEZHOV
1966
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 4.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021.
5,000
43501/21
18/08/2021
Vyacheslav Nikolayevich TITOV
1988
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 12.00 a.m. on 03/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 24/03/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
43680/21
10/08/2021
Vladimir Aleksandrovich LAZAR
1999
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
04/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 4.30 p.m. to an unspecified time on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021.
4,000
44318/21
09/08/2021
Rinat Safayevich SALIKHOV
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention for
8 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 9.15 a.m. on 03/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
44678/21
26/08/2021
Darya Dmitriyevna LEVKINA
1998
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kurgan
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Kurgan Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Kurgan Regional Court, 17/03/2021.
3,500
47849/21
08/09/2021
Yevgeniy Vadimovich ROYZMAN
1962
Fedotova Yuliya
Yekaterinburg
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Yekaterinburg
23/01/2021
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Yekaterinburg
31/01/2021
Rally (march) in support of Mr Navalnyy
Yekaterinburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
fine of
RUB 20,000
fine of RUB 20,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
20/05/2021
Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 13/05/2021 and
20/05/2021
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
26/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 13/05/2021, 20/05/2021 and 26/05/2021;
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls to participate at two unauthorised public rallies in support to Mr A. Navalnyy, scheduled on 31/01/2021 and on 21/04/2021, under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention for one day, final decisions: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 13/05/2021 (both proceedings).
5,000
50470/21
01/10/2021
Vladislav Vladimirovich BASHKINOV
2000
Solovyev Stanislav Vyacheslavovich
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 6.00 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 02/04/2021.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
