CASE OF FINIK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Doc ref: 24793/17;24803/17;57933/17;72440/17;1289/18;23240/18;30984/18;5563/19;11832/22;47169/22 • ECHR ID: 001-229414
Document date: December 14, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF FINIK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Application no. 24793/17 and 9 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
14 December 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision .
In the case of Finik and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
MÄrtiņš Mits , President , KateÅ™ina Å imáÄková, Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges ,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 November 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Conventionâ€) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Ukrainian Government (“the Governmentâ€) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
THE LAW
4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
5. The applicants complained that the length of the civil proceedings in their cases had been incompatible with the “reasonable time†requirement and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention.
6. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
7. In the leading case of Karnaushenko v. Ukraine (no. 23853/02, 30 November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
8. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time†requirement.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.
10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 13 of the Convention.
11. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Karnaushenko, cited above, §§ 70 and 75), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 December 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina MÄrtiņš Mits
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Start of proceedings
End of proceedings
Total length
Levels of jurisdiction
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros) [1]
24793/17
24/03/2017
Vladyslav Vasylyovych FINIK
1974
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
14/11/2014
pending
More than
8 years and
11 months and 20 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
1,800
24803/17
24/03/2017
Ivan Grygorovych KORSUN
1959
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
03/11/2014
12/11/2020
6 years and
10 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
500
57933/17
28/07/2017
Oleksandr Vasylyovych LYUBARETS
1976
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
17/11/2014
25/08/2022
7 years and
9 months and
9 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
2,100
72440/17
22/09/2017
Sergiy Igorevych NECHYPORENKO
1973
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
21/04/2015
pending
More than
8 years and
6 months and 13 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
1,800
1289/18
29/12/2017
Valentyn Valeriyovych SUKHAR
1972
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
18/11/2014
04/08/2022
7 years and
8 months and 17 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
1,200
23240/18
11/05/2018
Dmytro Volodymyrovych ANDREYEV
1976
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
18/11/2014
13/01/2021
6 years and
1 months and 27 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
1,500
30984/18
25/06/2018
Volodymyr Yuriyovych MARACH
1980
Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych
Chernigiv
10/11/2014
19/05/2022
7 years and
6 months and 10 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
1,200
5563/19
11/01/2019
Tetyana Viktorivna CHUSHKO
1980
Loshakov Dmytro Sergiyovych
Kyiv
29/09/2009
18/09/2018
8 years and
11 months and 21 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
1,800
11832/22
10/02/2022
Olga Dmytrivna ORYSHCHUK
1961
Reshetov Viktor Viktorovych
Chernivsti
30/12/2016
25/05/2022
5 years and
4 months and 26 days
1 level of jurisdiction
1,500
47169/22
23/09/2022
Anatoliy Andriyovych YORZH
1983
Orez Valentyn Pavlovych
Odesa
28/03/2016
01/06/2022
6 years and
2 months and 5 days
3 levels of jurisdiction
500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.