LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF ZENKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 8507/20, 9192/20, 9256/20, 9275/20, 9414/20, 9476/20, 9577/20, 10254/20, 11438/20, 13693/20, 13740/2... • ECHR ID: 001-224089
Document date: April 13, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
CASE OF ZENKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 8507/20, 9192/20, 9256/20, 9275/20, 9414/20, 9476/20, 9577/20, 10254/20, 11438/20, 13693/20, 13740/2... • ECHR ID: 001-224089
Document date: April 13, 2023
Cited paragraphs only
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF ZENKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 8507/20 and 21 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
13 April 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Zenkin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Faris Vehabović , President , Armen Harutyunyan, Anja Seibert-Fohr , judges ,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 March 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Conventionâ€) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Governmentâ€) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia , nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 13 July 2021).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for administrative offence. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see KudreviÄius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey , no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic societyâ€.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in its well-established case-law (see Butkevich v. Russia , no. 5865/07, §§ 63 ‑ 65, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-23 10 April 2018; Kalyapin v. Russia , no. 6095/09, § 76, 23 July 2019; and Korneyeva v. Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public events; and Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, related to the examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the Federal Code of Administrative Offences (CAO)).
13. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of the fairness of the administrative offence proceedings and alleged restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
14. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.â€
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 April 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Faris Vehabović
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros) [1]
8507/20
31/01/2020
Andrey Yuryevich ZENKIN
1993Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Tverskaya str., Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
26/08/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence
4,000
9192/20
03/02/2020
Anton Konstantinovich PROKOSHEV
2001Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
24/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - administrative escorting for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and detention in excess of 3 hours,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
9256/20
03/02/2020
Margarita Vadimovna ILYUSHINA
1993Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
9275/20
03/02/2020
Tatyana Anatolyevna SOSNOVA
1970Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
10/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
9414/20
03/02/2020
Aleksandr Andreyevich ZAMYATIN
1991Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Trubnaya square, Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
18/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27-29/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in administrative offence proceedings
4,000
9476/20
12/02/2020
Yevgeniy Valeryevich FADEYENKOV
1976Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow, Stoleshnikov alley
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 15.000
Moscow City Court
18/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and escorting to the police office on 27/07/2019 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
9577/20
12/02/2020
Svetlana Alekseyevna ASTAKHOVA
1964Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow, Tverskaya street
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
20/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and escorting to the police office on 27/07/2019 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
10254/20
13/02/2020
Dmitriy Valeryevich VASILYEV
1976Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
02/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative arrest;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - lack of the prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
11438/20
14/02/2020
Konstantin Stanislavovich OPARIN
1984Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich
Moscow
Manifestation against electronic voting in Mosgorduma elections
Strastnoy boulevard, Moscow
18/04/2019
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Tverskaya str., Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
14/08/2019
Moscow City Court
10/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – arrest and detention on 18/04/2019 and the on 27-29/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up the records of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative offence proceedings
5,000
13693/20
28/02/2020
Sergey Leonidovich SURIN
2000Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
28/08/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - lack of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
13740/20
22/02/2020
Yegor Aleksandrovich DVINYANIN
1987Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich
Moscow
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
06/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14250/20
22/01/2020
Vladislav Gavrilovich DULTSOV
1994Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
10/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention in excess of 3 hours on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14263/20
22/01/2020
Danila Andreyevich KUSTOVSKIY
1997Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 150,000
Moscow City Court
30/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention in excess of 3 hours on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; the applicant was only released on 29/07/2017,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
5,000
14265/20
22/01/2020
Valeriy Ivanovich LIVADNYY
1959Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
04/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention in excess of 3 hours on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14266/20
22/01/2020
Aleksandr Sergeyevich NIKITIN
1989Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
06/11/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention in excess of 3 hours on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14269/20
22/01/2020
Dmitriy Alekseyevich POSHVIN
1986Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
06/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention in excess of 3 hours on 27/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14298/20
22/01/2020
Ayur Barasovich SANDANOV
1984Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
30/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14300/20
22/01/2020
Pavel Stepanovich SARKISYAN
1971Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
30/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14301/20
22/01/2020
Aleksandr Yaroslavovich SEMENOV
1998Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
30/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14305/20
22/01/2020
Artem Simonovich SOLOVEYCHIK
1960Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
08/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14307/20
22/01/2020
Aleksandr Andreyevich STARIKOV
1995Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
30/09/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
14311/20
22/01/2020
Ivan Nikolayevich SHKUTA
1985Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
27/07/2019
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
16/10/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 27-28/07/2019 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative offence proceedings
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
