Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KHATYPOV v. RUSSIA and 25 other applications

Doc ref: 47699/19, 34096/20, 44448/20, 47007/20, 52653/20, 55752/20, 9356/21, 22252/21, 30954/21, 30974/21, 3... • ECHR ID: 001-224970

Document date: May 4, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 2
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

KHATYPOV v. RUSSIA and 25 other applications

Doc ref: 47699/19, 34096/20, 44448/20, 47007/20, 52653/20, 55752/20, 9356/21, 22252/21, 30954/21, 30974/21, 3... • ECHR ID: 001-224970

Document date: May 4, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 30 May 2023

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 47699/19 Artem Kamilyevich KHATYPOV against Russia and 25 other applications

(see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.

In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities which are the subject of well ‑ established case law of the Court (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Detention facility

Period of detention

Specific circumstances

Other complaints under well-established case-law

47699/19

08/08/2019

Artem Kamilyevich KHATYPOV

1990SIZO-1 Komi Republic,

IK-1 Komi Republic

06/05/2021 -

15/07/2021

11/11/2020 - 11/02/2021

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - on 24/05/2021 the applicant was placed in a metal cage while he participated in a court hearing by means of a video link (the complaint was introduced on 08/06/2021)

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of detention during transport by vans, trains on several occasions between 14/06/2019-06/08/2020: insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet

34096/20*

04/06/2021

Dzharakhudzha Safarkhudzhayevich ABDULLOYEV

1987IK-42 Krasnoyarsk Region

11/04/2019-18/02/2021

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

44448/20*

05/10/2020

Artem Dmitriyevich PASICHENKO

1997SIZO-1 St Petersburg

16/07/2020 - 16/01/2021

opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train from Bryansk to St Petersburg from 29 to 30/06/2020; lack or insufficient quality of food; in the letter received by the Court on 16/03/2021 the applicant. complains about transport on 16/01/2021 (St Petersburg - Vologda by train), 27/01/2021 (Vologda - Kirov by train), 06/02/2021 (2 hours in a van and Kirov - Yekaterinburg by train) raising overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of heating and ventilation

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during court hearings at 224th Garrison Military Court during 30/06/2020 - 11/08/2020

47007/20

17/03/2021

Dmitriy Viktorovich LEBEDINTSEV

1975IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region

19/02/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators

52653/20*

11/01/2021

Sergey Nikolayevich BUSHMANOV

1984IZ-1

St Petersburg, psychiatric hospital no. 6 of St Petersburg

25/03/2020 - 02/09/2020; 02/09/2020 - 30/09/2020; 30/09/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention in a metal cage in the hearings from the Vyborgskiy District Court of St Petersburg between 25/03/2020 and 18/11/2020

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of placement in metal cage

Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - from 23/03/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

(latest statement of appeal submitted was lodged on 25/09/2020)

55752/20

14/01/2021

Timur Amrailovich ALLAKHVERDIYEV

1991IK-31 Komi Republic

20/04/2020-20/02/2021

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.

9356/21

19/07/2021

Aleksey Vladimirovich TASKIN

1985IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region

29/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region, form 29/06/2016 to 17/03/2021, personal space 3.33 sq. m, 170 inmates in a brigade,

5 toilets, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, overcrowding

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions during transport

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, on numerous occasions from 17/03/2021 to 12/04/2021, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet

22252/21*

14/04/2021

Artur Rafikovich RAGIMOV

1986IK-18 Yamalo-Nenetsk Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region

17/11/2006 -ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

30954/21

14/05/2021

Shakhban Sultanovich GERIMSULTANOV

1971IK-25 Komi Republic

01/01/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

30974/21*

14/05/2021

Abdurauf Ravshanovich SUVANOV

1990IK-25 Komi Republic

16/09/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

30976/21

10/05/2021

Narkuzi Abdusattarovich ANARKULOV

1976IK-25 Komi Republic

01/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

31272/21

26/05/2021

Asliddin Talabshoyevich NAZAROV

1988IK-25 Komi Republic

2010 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

31584/21

24/07/2021

Oleg Yuryevich BOCHAROV

1981IK-49 Komi Republic

18/08/2016 - 01/11/2021

opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

32736/21*

28/05/2021

Aleksey Viktorovich BOGDANOV

1974IK-6 Khabarovsk Region

26/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance

Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during the hearings (via video-link) in Sol-Iletskiy and Leninskiy District Courts of Orenburg from 04/02/2021 to 15/07/2021

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

34147/21*

20/08/2021

Kirill Gennadyevich PERMINOV

1992IK-25 Komi Republic

21/05/2018-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

43124/21

22/04/2021

Stanislav Olegovich MARTYNENKO

1984IK-25 Komi Republic

18/12/2019 –

ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

43535/21

09/08/2021

Vitaliy Gennadyevich SHMONIN

1987IK-19 Komi Republic

09/08/2021 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

43732/21

11/08/2021

Aleksandr Nikolayevich MILEKHIN

1995IK-25 Komi Republic

17/12/2017 ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, disciplinary cells

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

43749/21

06/08/2021

Vitaliy Yuryevich SAFONOV

1982IK-49 Komi Republic

02/03/2017

ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

43899/21*

11/08/2021

Arayk Ashotovich TARPOSHYAN

1987IK-25 Komi Republic

15/04/2018 - 27/03/2021

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

10311/22*

18/03/2022

Sergey Nikolayevich MIGUNOV

1973FKU Tyurma Krasnoyarsk Region

08/10/2021-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

10647/22*

01/02/2022

Vadim Mikhaylovich ROZANOV

1977SIZO-1 St Petersburg

18/05/2021 - 05/01/2022

video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of the inadequate conditions during transport

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - multiple transfers between the remand prison and the courthouse between 15/05/2021 and 06/12/2021 in an overcrowded van. Transfers lasted 2 to 4 hours

10679/22

25/01/2022

Gamzat Umarovich ABDUSAMADOV

1991IK-31 Komi Republic

11/05/2017-25/01/2022

opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

11652/22

16/02/2022

Vasiliy Alekseyevich FRANCHUK

1987IK-29 Kirov Region

October 2020 - September 2021

opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

11736/22

16/02/2022

Mikhail Andreyevich SEMYKIN

1990IK-29 Kirov Region

03/08/2017-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged

detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

13219/22*

09/02/2022

Oleg Olegovich LYUSHENKO

1988IVS Vyshny Volochyok, SIZO-1 Tver Region, SIZO-1 Yaroslavl

10/12/2019 - 08/11/2021

opposite-sex operators

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255