LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CERIT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
Doc ref: 6517/20;13324/20;15398/20;21291/20;23501/20;41684/20;46888/20 • ECHR ID: 001-226096
Document date: June 29, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
CERIT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
Doc ref: 6517/20;13324/20;15398/20;21291/20;23501/20;41684/20;46888/20 • ECHR ID: 001-226096
Document date: June 29, 2023
Cited paragraphs only
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 6517/20 Yusuf Ulvi CERIT against Türkiye and 6 other applications
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 29 June 2023 as a Committee composed of:
Frédéric Krenc , President , Diana Sârcu, Davor DerenÄinović , judges ,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Governmentâ€), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
By letters sent by registered post and dated 18 February 2022, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants. No reply to the letters has been received by the Court and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about the change of address.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.
Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 20 July 2023.
Viktoriya Maradudina Frédéric Krenc Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 of the Convention
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant’s name Year of Birth
Represented by
1.
6517/20
Cerit v. Türkiye
14/01/2020
Yusuf Ulvi CERIT 1971
2.
13324/20
İstanbul v. Türkiye
18/02/2020
Selim Ä°STANBUL 1984
Tuba Ä°STANBUL
3.
15398/20
Karataşlı v. Türkiye
10/02/2020
Süleyman KARATAŞLI 1971
4.
21291/20
Türk v. Türkiye
27/04/2020
Kenan TÃœRK 1980
5.
23501/20
Kösmene v. Türkiye
08/05/2020
Ali Baz KÖSMENE 1974
Büşra KESER
6.
41684/20
Kaya v. Türkiye
02/09/2020
Sezgin KAYA 1973
ErdoÄŸan DINCEL
7.
46888/20
Çakır v. Türkiye
09/10/2020
Recep ÇAKIR 1976
Abdurrahman ÇAKIR
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
