Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

HAMILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR E. BUSUTTIL

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: December 2, 1997

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

HAMILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR E. BUSUTTIL

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: December 2, 1997

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF MR E. BUSUTTIL

I remain of the view, for the reasons spelled out in the dissenting part of my opinion in the John Murray case (Application No. 18731/91) decided by the Commission on 27 June 1994, that the drawing of adverse inferences from the applicant's silence deprived him of a fair trial and infringed the principle of the presumption of innocence.

Accordingly, I consider that there has been a violation of both paras. 1 and 2 of Article 6 of the Convention.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846