Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KABARDOKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 33 other applications

Doc ref: 11421/13, 15459/13, 15473/13, 15625/13, 15651/13, 18295/13, 18767/13, 18775/13, 19142/13, 19161/13, ... • ECHR ID: 001-146459

Document date: August 28, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 32

KABARDOKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 33 other applications

Doc ref: 11421/13, 15459/13, 15473/13, 15625/13, 15651/13, 18295/13, 18767/13, 18775/13, 19142/13, 19161/13, ... • ECHR ID: 001-146459

Document date: August 28, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 28 August 2014

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 11421/13 Khamid Khatutovich KABARDOKOV and others against Russia and 33 other applications (see list appended)

STATEMENT OF FACTS

T he appli cants are 223 Russian nationals listed in Appendix 1 . They live in various towns of the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria .

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

A. The circumstances of the case

The applicants were clean-up workers at the site of the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident. As a result they suffered from extensive exposure to radioactive emissions which later led to their d isability.

In late 2010 the applicants lodged a complaint with the Nalchik Town Court of the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria (“the Town Court”) against the Russian Ministry of Finance seeking compensation of non ‑ pecuniary damage in the above connection.

In the period between January and April 2011 (see Appendix 2 , column no. 2) t he Town Court allowed the applicants ’ claims in part and awarded the applicants compensations between 1,200,000 - 1,600,000 Russian roubles (approximately 25,000 - 33 ,000 euros ) (see Appendix 3 ).

The judgments above have not been appealed against and became final and enforceable.

In the period between June and November 2011 the Department of the Federal Treasury Fund in the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria (“the FTF”) on behalf of the Russian Ministry of Finance lodged an appeal with the Supreme Cou rt of the Republic of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria (“the Supreme Court of Kabardino-Balkaria”) against the final judgment s in the applicants’ favour through the Town Court (Appendix 2 , column no. 2) . They also requested that the statutory ten-day time ‑ limit for lodging such an appeal against the judgment s be restored.

In the same period (Appendix 2 , column no. 3) the Town Court refused to restore the time-limit for appealing against the main judgments , stating that the FTF provided no valid reasons for missing it. The latter decision s were not appealed against and became final.

Meantime some of the applicants received the awarded compensations while the others were waiting (see Appendix 3 ) .

In the period between July and November 2012 the FTF lodged an appeal with the Town Court against the previous refusals (Appendix 2 , column no. 3). They also requested that the ten ‑ day statutory time- limit for appealing against those decision s be restored on the ground s that their copies had not been forwarded to the FTF .

In the same period (Appendix 2 , column no. 4) the Town Court ordered that the time ‑ limit for appeal be extended on the grounds that the re was no evidence that the FTF had received refusals in due course.

In the period between July and November 2012 the applicants appealed against the latter decisions before the Supreme Court of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria on the grounds that according to the domestic law the court should forward a copy of its decision only to those parties, which were not present at the court hearings. However, according to the applicants, since the FTF’s representative participated in the proceedings, the court was not required to forward them a copy of the decision.

In the period between August and December 2012 (Appendix 2, column no. 4) the Supreme Court of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria found that the Town Court lawfully extended the time-limits for appeals but held that the grounds for the extensions were incorrect. The Supreme Court of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria in particular held that the Russian Ministry of Finance could not be said to have been duly represented in those proceedings as the transcript of a hearing did not provide the details regarding the power of attorney of Ms B., who had acted as a representative of the Russian Ministry of Finance. I n such circumstances the Town Court should have forwarded a copy of the decision to the defendant but had failed to do so. Accordingly , the Supreme Court held that the Russian Ministry of Finance had valid excuse in missing the statutory time-limit for appealing against the Town Court ’ s decision s taken between June and November 2011 (Appendix 2, column no. 3).

In the period between September 2012 and February 2013 (Appendix 2, column no. 5) the Supreme Court of Kabardino-Balkaria quashed the Town Court’s refusals (Appendix 2, column no. 3) and restored the time-limit for appealing against the main judgment s (Appendix 2 , column no. 2) . It noted, in particular , as follows :

“... As it transpires from the case materials the defendant [the Russian Ministry of Finance] was represented by Ms B. ... who participated in the first instance court hearing on examination of the case on the merits and, accordingly, was aware of the delivered judgment [Town Court’s judgment in the applicants’ favour].

Therefore submission of an appeal against that judgment [Town Court] within the time ‑ limit provided by Article 338 of the Russian Code of Civil Procedure depended on the representative’s good faith … Accordingly, failure to comply with the time ‑ limit by the defendant evidently was a consequence of improper fulfillment of the obligations by the representative , which obviously led to substantial violation of the Russian Federation’s rights in supporting its position before the court of appeal.”

In the period between September 2012 and March 2013 (Appendix 2, column no. 6) the Supreme Court of Kabardino-Balkaria quashed the Town Court ’ s main judgment and dismissed the applicants ’ claims in full. It noted that the domestic law concerning compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage had been introduced on 31 May 1991 after the Chernobyl nuclear accident had occurred, therefore the applicants were not entitled to any compensation. The Supreme Court further ordered the applicants to return the money they had received pursuant to the Town Court’s judgment s taken between January and April 2011 (Appendix 2, column no. 2).

Three applicants, Mr Kolomiyets (applicant no. 67), Mr Lepekhin (applicant no. 78) and Mr Apanasenko (applicant no. 101) died on 30 and 26 March and 23 July 2013 respectively, after they filed their applica tions with the Court. By letter of 17 April 2014 the applicant s ’ wives informed the Court about their husbands ’ decease and expressed the intention to continue proceedings.

B. Relevant domestic law and practice

Article 112 of the Russian C ode of C ivil P rocedure (“CCP”) provides that a compe tent court may extend a time-limit for procedural actions, such as lodging an appeal, if the court finds that a party has a valid excuse for a failure to comply with that time-limit.

Article 227 of the CCP stipulates that a copy of a decision concerning termination of proceedings shall be forwarded to the parties to the proceedings if they were not present at the hearing within three days after its delivery .

Under Article 338 of the CCP , in force before 1 January 2012 , an appeal in a civil case could be lodged within ten days after the delivery of a first ‑ insta nce judgment in its final form. After 1 January 2012 the time ‑ limit for lodging an appeal has been extended to one month under Article 321 of the CCP .

Under Article 392 of the CCP a final judgment in a case may be reviewed, inter alia , on the ground that the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the Convention on account of the domestic judicial proceedings or decisions taken in t hat case. Articles 393 ‑ 94 set out a procedure for reopening of domestic judicial proceedings in any such case.

Article 1109 § 3 of the CCP stipulates that , if a decision to grant compensations for damages to health to a person in the absence of a bad faith and miscalculations on his or her part is quashed on appeal or by way of supervisory review, the compensation itself cannot be claimed back .

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that restoration of the time-limit for an appeal resulting in quashing of the final judgment in their favour violated the principle of legal certainty. The applicants further complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention that reversal of the compensations awarded by the Town Court, which had already been paid to some of the applicants, violated their right to property.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Regard being had to the decisions listed in columns nos. 5 and 6 of Appendix 2, by which the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria, at requests of the Russian Ministry of Finance, restored a time-limit for appealing against decisions listed in columns nos. 3 and 2 of Appendix 2 respectively, were the guarantees of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and in particular the principle of legal certainty, respected (see Bezrukovy v. Russia , no. 34616/02, §§ 32-36, 10 May 2012)?

2. Have there been any other examples, not stemming from the facts as described in the present case, where a time-limit for an appeal was restored on similar grounds? The Government are invited to submit their reply with references to domestic practice, if any.

3. D id the quashing of the final judgment s in the applicants’ favour constitute an i nterference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of the possession in the form of the judgment debt? If so, was such interference justified in terms of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?

Appendix 1

1. Application no. 11421/13 lodged on 22 January 2013 :

2. Application no. 15459/13 lod ged on 9 February 2013 :

3. Application no. 15473/13 lodged on 9 February 2013:

4. Application no. 1 5625/13 lodged on 9 February 2013:

5. Application no. 15651/13 lodged on 9 February 2013:

6. Application no. 18295/13 lodged on 20 February 2013:

7. Application no. 18767/13 lodged on 12 February 2013:

8. Application no. 18775/13 lodged on 22 February 2013:

9. Application no. 19142/13 lodged on 22 February 2013:

10. Application no. 19161/13 lodged on 14 February 2013:

11. Application no. 19179/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

12. Application no. 19237/13 lodged on 12 February 2013:

13. Application no. 19259/ 13 lodged on 15 February 2013:

14. Application no. 19320/13 lodged on 9 February 2013:

15. Application no. 19398/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

16. Application no. 19408/13 lodged on 14 February 2013:

17. Application no. 19422/13 lodged on 9 February 2013:

18. Application no. 19541/13 lodged on 17 February 2013:

19 . Application no. 19549/13 lodged on 11 February 2013:

20 . Application no. 19556/13 lodged on 11 February 2013:

21. Application no. 19687/13 lodged on 11 February 2013:

22. Application no. 19697/13 lodged on 11 February 2013:

23 . Application no. 19722/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

24 . Application no. 22925/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

25. Application no. 22935 /13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

26. Application no. 22953/13 lodged on 25 February 2013:

27. Application no. 23006 /13 lodged on 12 February 2013:

28. Application no. 23109/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

29. Application no. 23135/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

30. Application no. 23145/13 lodged on 13 February 2013:

31. Application no. 23177/13 lodged on 26 March 2013:

32. Application no. 26466/13 lodged on 11 February 2013:

33. Application no. 58066/13 lodged on 26 August 2013:

34. Application no. 60167/13 lodged on 5 September 2013 :

A PPENDIX 2

No.

Application no. / Case Title

Column no. 1

Main judgment taken on (final on)

Column no. 2

Refusal to restore time ‑ limit for appealing against the main judgment

Column no. 3

Decision to grant restoration of time-limit for appealing against refusal to restore time ‑ limit (final on)

Column no. 4

Decision to grant restoration of time-limit for appealing against the main judgment

Column no. 5

Decision to quash the main judgment

Column no. 6

1.

11421/13

KABARDOKOV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (25/04/11)

08/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

7/09/12

2.

15459/13

AYTEKOV and others v. Russia

18/02/11 (01/03/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

3.

15473/13

ANTONOV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (22/04/11)

16/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

4.

15625/13

GUKEZHEV and others v. Russia

18/02/11 (01/03/11)

08/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

7/09/12

5.

15651/13

ARKHIPOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

08/06/11

24/0812

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

6.

18295/13

TAOV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (22/04/11)

16/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

7.

18767/13

TANKANG and others v. Russia

11/04/11 (22/04/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

8.

18775/13

TSYB and others v. Russia

24/05/11 (07/06/11)

01/11/11

24/08/12

(20/09/12)

04/10/12

04/10/12

9.

19142/13

BITTIROV and others v. Russia

05/04/11 (18/04/11)

07/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

10.

19161/13

TSIRKHOV and others v. Russia

11/04/11 (22/04/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

11.

19179/13

VLASOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

12.

19237/13

VELICHKO and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

13.

19259/13

KHATSUKOV and others v. Russia

11/04/11 (21/04/11)

16/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

14.

19320/13

AFAUNOV and others v. Russia

15/02/11 (01/03/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

15.

19398/13

BORIYEV and others v. Russia

14/02/11 (25/02/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

7/09/12

16.

19408/13

APANASENKO and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

09/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

17.

19422/13

BOTTAEV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (25/04/11)

16/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

18.

19541/13

GEDMISHKOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

19.

19549/13

GERDASOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

09/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

20.

19556/13

GOROYEV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (25/04/11)

06/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

21.

19687/13

AYBAZOV and others v. Russia

04/04/11 (15/04/11)

08/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

22.

19697/13

BIDAK and others v. Russia

04/04/11 (15/04/11)

07/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

23.

19722/13

ALKHASOV and others v. Russia

04/04/11 (15/04/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

24.

22925/13 ABDURAKHMONOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

09/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

25.

22935/13

ABAZOV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

08/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

26.

22953/13

KUSHKHOV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (25/04/11)

08/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

27.

23006/13

YERMOLOV and others v. Russia

11/04/11 (21/04/11)

08/06/11

24/08/12

(26/09/12)

12/10/12

12/10/12

28.

23109/13

BELUNIN and others v. Russia

16/02/11 (01/03/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

7/09/12

29.

23135/13

KACHANOV and others v. Russia

04/04/11 (15/04/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

30.

23145/13

GURTUYEV and others v. Russia

12/04/11 (22/04/11)

16/06/11

24/08/12

(27/09/12)

10/10/12

10/10/12

31.

23177/13

BEZYANOV and others v. Russia

18/02/11 (01/03/11)

08/06/11

15/11/12

(27/12/12)

27/02/13

27/02/13

32.

26466/13

ATABIYEV and others v. Russia

10/03/11 (22/03/11)

09/06/11

20/07/12

(22/08/12)

07/09/12

07/09/12

33.

58066 /13

NISHANOV v. Russia

17/01/11-(27/02/11)

06/06/11

16/11/12

(26/12/12)

28/02/13

28/02/13

34.

60167/13

KODZOKOV v. Russia

18/01/11 (28/02/11)

08/06/11

16/11/12

(26/12/12)

28/02/13

06/03/13

APPENDIX 3

No.

Applicants

Amount of awarded compensation

(RUB)

Compensation paid:

 - “yes”

 - “no”

Khamid Khatutovich KABARDOKOV

1,500,000

Viktor Vladimirovich BOCHARNIKOV

1,500,000

Yuriy Khadisovich GERGOV

1,500,000

Mukhadin Adamovich DOTKULOV

1,500,000

Zamir Misostovich KARDANOV

1,500,000

Gali Ezdanovich SHAOV

1,500,000

Baydulakh Magometovich AYTEKOV

1,500,000

Askerbiy Aslanovich BAYSIYEV

1,500,000

Ivan Grigoryevich ZAIKA

1,500,000

Viktor Mikhaylovich KREMENTSOV

1,500,000

Vasiliy Vasilyevich POPOVICH

1,500,000

Mikhail Mikhaylovich PANCHENKO

1,200,000

Sergey Ivanovich SOBAKAR

1,500,000

Ruslan Galiyevich UMAROV

1,500,000

Sergey Ivanovich ANTONOV

1,500,000

Assad Ogly Abassovich BABAYEV

1,500,000

Vladimir Petrovich BORIYEV

1,500,000

Khamid Khasanovich GUZIYEV

1,500,000

Viktor Vasilyevich DEYKIN

1,500,000

Urazay Musayevich KOKKEZOV

1,500,000

Ramazan Mustafayevich MOKAYEV

1,500,000

Marat Vladimirovich SRUKOV

1,500,000

Timur Khasanovich GUKEZHEV

1,500,000

Gisa Musayevich GUCHAPSHEV

1,500,000

Isuf Abuzedovich KUMYKOV

1,500,000

Mikhail Aniuarovich SARAKHOV

1,500,000

Arsen Khasanbiyevich URUSMAMBETOV

1,500,000

Seyf u Yusufovich KHAIROV

1,500,000

Muayed Khasanovich KHOKONOV

1,300,000

Ivan Timofeyevich ARKHIPOV

1,300,000

Muayed Sultanovich GEDMISHKHOV

1,300,000

Aleksey Dmitriyevich DADONOV

1,300,000

Khasen Vladimirovich ZHUZHUYEV

1,300,000

Vladimir Andreyevich KUDRITSKIY

1,300,000

Aleksandr Alekseyevich LARIN

1,300,000

Nikolay Fedorovich MENYAYLO

1,300,000

Vladimir Abramovich SHPAKOV

1,300,000

Zhora Khasanovich ERZHIBOV

1,300,000

Saladin Khautiyevich TAOV

1,600,000

Stanislav Sergeyevich ANOSOV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BORISENKO

1,300,000

Sergey Maratovich MAGOMEDOV

1,500,000

Ruslan Khadisovich MISROKOV

1,300,000

Aleksandr Nikolayevich SVIRIDENKO

1,500,000

Sultan Batyrbiyevich KHAMSHOKOV

1,500,000

Vladimir Grigoryevich TANKANAG

1,200,000

Andemirkan Muratovich KUCHMENOV

1,200,000

Karalbi Gidovich KEREFOV

1,200,000

Viktor Mikhaylovich TSYB

1,200,000

Igor Anatolyevich RYABTSEV

1,200,000

Aleksandr Ilyich KAGITIN

1,200,000

Mustafa Bekiyevich MANIYAYEV

1,200,000

Khasym Yusupovich BITTIROV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Mukharbiyevich ZRUMOV

1,300,000

Viktor Khazhmuratovich KUGOTOV

1,500,000

Auyes Khapitovich TSIRKHOV

1,200,000

Yuriy Alekseyevich NEKRASOV

1,200,000

Nikolay Ivanovich KHRUSHCHEV

1,200,000

Vasiliy Maksimovich LASHIN

1,200,000

Anatoliy Alekseyevich VARCHENKO

1,200,000

Magarram Vali Ogly NASIBOV

1,200,000

Vladimir Ivanovich PARSHAKOV

1,200,000

Viktor Nikolayevich YURCHENKO

1,200,000

Vasiliy Alekseyevich BOBROVENKO

1,200,000

Vladimir Timofeyevich SAVCHENKO

1,200,000

Nikolay Petrovich VLASOV

1,500,000

Vladimir Mikhaylovich KOLOMIYETS

1,500,000

Nikolay Ivanovich PRASOL

1,500,000

Leonid Spiridonovich PURKIN

1,500,000

Aleksandr Nikolayevich PEKAR

1,300,000

Aslanbi Adamovich TANASHEV

1,300,000

Aleksandr Mikhaylovich TOKAREV

1,300,000

Vladimir Nikolayevich VELICHKO

1,300,000

Vladimir Pavlovich ISTOMIN

1,300,000

Nikolay Nikolayevich KONONOV

1,300,000

Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KILDISHOV

1,300,000

Leonid Talovich KAZHAROV

1,300,000

Sergey Filippovich LEPEKHIN

1,300,000

Pavel Ilyich LOGACHEV

1,300,000

Aleksandr Maksimovich LITYAYEV

1,300,000

Vasiliy Anatolyevich NIKOLAYENKO

1,300,000

Sarazhdin Talovich KHATSUKOV

1,200,000

Ruslan Leonidovich GUKEPSHOKOV

1,200,000

Murid Ayubovich BARAGUNOV

1,200,000

Sergey Ivanovich ARCHAKOV

1,200,000

Murid Borisovich BZHAUMYKHOV

1,200,000

Arsen Khabasovich KODZOKOV

1,200,000

Ashir Margeldyyevich ASHIROV

1,200,000

Albek Auyesovich AFAUNOV

1,500,000

Boris Sarzhudinovich BOKOV

1,500,000

Valeriy Emilevich GUBER

1,500,000

Viktor Semenovich KONTORIN

1,300,000

Vladimir Viktorovich LUKYANOV

1,300,000

Kazbek Safarbiyevich SHAOV

1,500,000

Vitaliy Viktorovich TSARKOV

1,300,000

Murik Blitovich BORIYEV

1,500,000

Anatoliy Adalgeriyevich KUMYKOV

1,500,000

Mukhazhid Mukhamedovich ORGANOKOV

1,500,000

Sergey Semenovich PANYAKIN

1,300,000

Boris Timofeyevich KHOKHLACHEV

1,500,000

Nikolay Konstantinovich APANASENKO

1,500,000

Oleg Valentinovich VOLODIN

1,200,000

Viktor Vladimirovich GLYBIN

1,300,000

Viktor Ivanovich KLOCHKOV

1,500,000

Viktor Petrovich LIKHTINOV

1,500,000

Amir Musarbiyevich PSHIGUSOV

1,300,000

Khasan Kilchukovich SIZHAZHEV

1,300,000

Nikolay Grigoryevich CHIKALENKO

1,500,000

Timosha Khazhpagovich SHADOV

1,300,000

Mikhail Lukmanovich BOTTAYEV

1,500,000

Bilyal Khangeriyevich KARDANOV

1,500,000

Taymoraz Khadzimussayevich MATAROV

1,500,000

Khazrit Tutovich MARGUSHEV

1,500,000

Vasiliy Alekseyevich TOKAREV

1,500,000

Shamil Khamidovich UYANAYEV

1,500,000

Ruslan Bashirovich KHATSUKOV

1,500,000

Anzor Khabilovich GEDMISHKHOV

1,300,000

Nikolay Ivanovich ZARKOV

1,300,000

Khasan Khazhimurzovich KOCHESOKOV

1,300,000

Mukhadin Aliyevich KOKOV

1,300,000

Bail Lyaliyevich NAGOYEV

1,300,000

Valeriy Yuryevich PUTEVTSOV

1,300,000

Khusen Gazaliyevich SABANCHIYEV

1,300,000

Igor Grigoryevich GREDASOV

1,300,000

Boris Ivanovich DEGTYARENKO

1,300,000

Khamid Bubovich KARDANOV

1,200,000

Yaroslav Yaroslavovich MORSIN

1,500,000

Nikolay Petrovich POTAPKIN

1,300,000

Aleksandr Dmitriyevich SEMOCHKIN

1,300,000

Viktor Gennadyevich SHVEDOV

1,300,000

Igor Aleksandrovich YURLOV

1,300,000

Magomet Tokayevich GOROYEV

1,500,000

Amir Kushbiyevich GELOYEV

1,500,000

Boris Pshimakhovich DZUGANOV

1,500,000

Nyusya Shagbanovna DOKSHUKINA

1,500,000

Vladimir Andreyevich POTKALO

1,500,000

Zalimgeri Gisovich TUROV

1,500,000

Zaur Shagirovich SHOMAKHOV

1,500,000

Artur Khatsuyevich SHOMAKHOV

1,500,000

Khusen Mazanovich AYBAZOV

1,500,000

Kharun Satyvaldyyevich GYZYYEV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Viktorovich KOSTENKO

1,500,000

Zhamal Zhapayevich KULBAYEV

1,500,000

Dmitriy Anatolyevich MININ

1,500,000

Mustafir Muradinovich OSMANOV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Nikolayevich FINOGENOV

1,500,000

Viktor Ivanovich BIDAK

1,300,000

Vladimir Aleksandrovich BUDNIKOV

1,300,000

Anatoliy Khambiyevich DOKHOV

1,500,000

Khazhmurat Yakhyayevich DZHANKULAYEV

1,500,000

Nikolay Mikhaylovich MUKOZHEV

1,500,000

Alisag Mukhamedovich TAKHUSHEV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Nikolayevich STEPANENKO

1,300,000

Vyacheslav Anibalovich TSIRKHOV

1,500,000

Mutalis Mikhaylovich ALKHASOV

1,500,000

Khyzyr Khadzhimuratovich KABARDOKOV

1,500,000

Anatoliy Talevich KONGAPSHEV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Nikolayevich PLAKHOV

1,500,000

Vasiliy Ilyich STRIZHAK

1,500,000

Akhmet Khasultanovich KHARSIYEV

1,500,000

Makhamadzhan Narbayevich KHAYNAZAROV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich CHERNYSHOV

1,500,000

Nikolay Khadinovich SHIKLYASHEV

1,500,000

Sergey Sobirovich ABDURAKHMONOV

1,500,000

Ruslan Khazhislamovich GONGAPSHEV

1,300,000

Vladimir Anatolyevich DEREPOVKO

1,500,000

Valeriy Aleksandrovich KOROVIN

1,500,000

Aleksey Timofeyevich KOZLOVTSEV

1,300,000

Sergey Petrovich LAPTEV

1,300,000

Pavel Alekseyevich NIKITENKO

1,500,000

Muayed Mastafovich SURMAMETOV

1,300,000

Zaurbek Ismagilovich SHANIBOV

1,200,000

Eduard Chartiyevich ABAZOV

1,300,000

Fedya Khuseynovich ZHEMGURAZOV

1,300,000

Sergey Konstantinovich ZYKOV

1,300,000

Yevgeniy Nikolayevich LAZAREV

1,300,000

Tobi Khasanbiyevich KUSHKHOV

1,500,000

Vladimir Kurgokovich SIBILOV

1,500,000

Viktor Andreyevich KHALIN

1,500,000

Shota Aleksandrovich YERMOLOV

1,200,000

Vasiliy Ivanovich SHEVYAKOV

1,200,000

Eduard Borisovich CHIKHRADZE

1,200,000

Valentina Grigoryevna POLYAKOVA

1,200,000

Khuseyn Seyfullakhovich GEKKIYEV

1,200,000

Sergey Otarovich GOBEDZHISHVILI

1,200,000

Anatoliy Khizirovich ZHAMBIKOV

1,200,000

Mikhail Vladimirovich BELUNIN

1,500,000

Nikolay Nikolayevich MARCHENKO

1,300,000

Gennadiy Andreyevich MOISEYENKO

1,300,000

Yuriy Grigoryevich MEDVEDEV

1,500,000

Talgat Avzalovich NURMUKHAMETOV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Vladimirovich PINYAYEV

1,500,000

Petr Ivanovich SLIPENKO

1,300,000

Tayib Ayubovich TADZHIBOV

1,300,000

Ivan Semenovich KACHANOV

1,300,000

Viktor Petrovich LICHMANOV

1,300,000

Sergey Timofeyevich NIKOLAYEV

1,300,000

Yuriy Stepanovich OBUKHOV

1,300,000

Garri Mikhaylovich POGOSOV

1,300,000

Sergey Leonidovich SADOVOY

1,300,000

Sergey Viktorovich KHARITONOV

1,300,000

Valeriy Akhmatovich GURTUYEV

1,500,000

Muayed Khusenovich LIGIDOV

1,500,000

Mukhamed Anatolyevich MAREMSHAOV

1,500,000

Vasiliy Ivanovich MARTYNYUK

1,500,000

Zamir Gumarovich TUKHUZHEV

1,200,000

Khusein Abdullayevich SHAKHABOV

1,500,000

Nikolay Yakovlevich SHTELVAKH

1,500,000

Mukharbek Mukhadinovich SHOMAKHOV

1,500,000

Vyacheslav Vladimirovich BEZYANOV

1,500,000

Viktor Ivanovich GAYDAR

1,500,000

Nikolay Nikolayevich STOLYARENKO

1,500,000

Viktor Konstantinovich SANKOV

1,500,000

Muzafar Tatukovich ATABIYEV

1,500,000

Boris Aliyevich BEPPAYEV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Vladimirovich KATASONOV

1,500,000

Khachim Dinovich PSHIKHACHEV

1,500,000

Ruslan Yuryevich TUMOV

1,500,000

Aniuar Zhansitovich TAOV

1,500,000

Aleksandr Amirkhanovich SHOMAKHOV

1,500,000

Eduard Dikanovich SHOMAKHOV

1,500,000

Ruslan Marufovich NISHANOV

1,500,000

Boris Nashkhovich KODZOKOV

1,500,000

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707