Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

TOPÇU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 24320/11 • ECHR ID: 001-189310

Document date: December 13, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

TOPÇU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 24320/11 • ECHR ID: 001-189310

Document date: December 13, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 13 December 2018

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 24320/11 Nurettin TOPÇU and others against Turkey lodged on 10 January 2011

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns a dispute between the applicants and the Treasury concerning some plots of land which were subjected to two different cadastral surveys in 1958 and 1973, respectively. Although the lands at issue were registered in the name of the Treasury following the first cadastral survey, they were registered in the name of the applicants following the second cadastral survey as they had title deeds.

Upon a correction request from the land registry, the lands ’ ownership was modified according to the first cadastral results, which gave rise to the annulment of some of the applicants ’ title deeds by the land registry commission in 1977. The applicants ’ case for the restitution of their title deeds was accepted by the cadastral court in 1980, on the grounds that the land registry commission had had no-competency to cancel or modify the final result of the cadastral survey.

In 2002, relying on the first cadastral results, the land registry examined of its own motion the registrations concerning the lands at issue and cancelled the applicants ’ title deeds considering that they violated the first cadastral results. The applicants objected to that decision, but their case was dismissed by the courts which found that in case of several cadastral surveys concerning the same land only the first survey would be taken into account.

Invoking Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complain that they had been unlawfully deprived of their property.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES

1. Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention?

In particular, did an action based on Article 1007 of the Civil Code constitute an effective remedy? If so, what was the time-limit for such an action and when did it start to run in the applicants ’ cases?

The Government are invited to submit examples of judicial decisions rendered in comparable situations and showing the effectiveness of this remedy.

2. In view of the applicants ’ title deeds relied on during the second cadastral survey; did the applicants have a property within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? If so, in the light of the conclusions reached in Anna Popova v. Russia (no. 59391/12, 4 October 2016) and Gladysheva v. Russia (no. 7097/10, 6 December 2011), did the registration of the applicants ’ lands as the property of the Treasury constitute a violation of applicants ’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possession within the meaning of the same provision?

APPENDIX

No.

First name Last name

Birth year

Nationality

Place of residence

Representative

Nurettin TOPÇU

1947Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Şerafettin AKÇA

1961Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Zühal ARAT

1977Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Nihal BİNNAZ (KAHRAMAN)

1958Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Gülay BOZAYI (KAHRAMAN)

1963Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Sibel CAN (BİNNAZ)

1980Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Binnur DAÄžDELEN

1964Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

İsmail DAĞDELEN

1953Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Şirin DİKKAŞ

1965Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Necla ERDURAN (KAHRAMAN)

1958Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Hamiyet ERGÜN

1954Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

İsmet ERGÜN

1947Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Mehmet Emin GÖKÇE

1941Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Ayşe GÖRGÜN

1973Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Rahim GÖRGÜN

1938Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Eray KAHRAMAN

1973Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Hüsniye KAHRAMAN

1936Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Fatma ÖZEN

1942Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Aynur ÖZTÜRK

1962Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Emel SENBİL

1972Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Meral SEVER (KAHRAMAN)

1970Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Erdinç SEVİM

1970Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Eşref SEVİM

1966Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Mukadder SEVİM

1947Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Hüsamettin TOPÇU

1956Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

AyÅŸe YAMAN (KAHRAMAN)

1966Turkish

TekirdaÄŸ

H. Nalbant Tekin

Mustafa YILMAZ

1930Turkish

Çorlu

H. Nalbant Tekin

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707