Communicated on 19 November 2019

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 6215/18 Mihály NAGY against Hungary lodged on 23 January 2018

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the attachment of two motorbikes which the applicant bought from a company. He submits that the attachment was unjustified since it ensued from the tax debts of the previous owner and was already statute-barred. Moreover, the claim in question was a minor sum and did not justify the attachment of two valuable motorbikes worth several thousand euros. As a result, he could not exercise his owner ’ s rights from April 2014 to July 2017.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Has there been an interference with the applicant ’ s peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? If so, was it justified (see, mutatis mutandis, Hábenczius v. Hungary , no. 44473/06 , 21 October 2014) ?