Resolution CM/ ResDH ( 2015) 132 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Five cases against Belgium

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

49204/99

ENTREPRISES ROBERT DELBRASSINNE S.A.

01/07/2004

01/10/2004

37330/02

DEFALQUE

20/04/2006

13/09/2006

43542/04

DE TURCK

25/09/2007

25/12/2007

12066/06

MATHY

24/04/2008

24/07/2008

47295/99

STOETERIJ ZANGERSHEIDE N.V. AND OTHERS

22/12/2004

22/03/2005

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 September 2015 at the 1235th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violation s established;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2015)796 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.