Resolution CM/ ResDH (2018)35 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Spain

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 31 January 2018 at the 1305 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

26178/04

MORENO CARMONA

09/06/2009

09/09/2009

28142/04

BENDAYAN AZCANTOT AND BENALAL BENDAYAN

09/06/2009

09/09/2009

73818/11+

MENÉNDEZ GARCÍA AND ÁLVAREZ GONZÁLEZ

15/03/2016

15/03/2016

16476/11

RUIZ-VILLAR RUIZ

20/12/2016

20/12/2016

64204/10

COMUNIDAD DE PROPRIETARIOS PANDO NÚMERO 20

20/12/2016

20/12/2016

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and the violations established of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on account of the excessive length of judicial proceedings;

Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court where applicable (see document DH-DD(2017)488 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination thereof.