ANTALNÉ BOTÁR AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Doc ref: 11193/21 • ECHR ID: 001-217946
Document date: May 19, 2022
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 11193/21 Gyöngyvér ANTALNÉ BOTÁR and Others
against Hungary
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 19 May 2022 as a Committee composed of:
Alena Poláčková, President, Raffaele Sabato, Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 January 2021,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having regard to the letter of the applicants’ representative dated 30 March 2022;
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
On 30 March 2022 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that Margit Bábelné Dálnoki, Ferenc Barna, Lajos Honyák, István Kővári, Anna Méhészné Kis, Henrikné Morvay and András Valaska withdrew their complaints.
In regard to the remaining applicants, the Court received the friendly ‑ settlement declaration, signed by the parties, under which those applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants Margit Bábelné Dálnoki, Ferenc Barna, Lajos Honyák, István Kővári, Anna Méhészné Kis, Henrikné Morvay and András Valaska may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application in their regard.
Moreover, the Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the Government and the remaining applicants. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of these complaints.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention in regard to the applicants Margit Bábelné Dálnoki, Ferenc Barna, Lajos Honyák, István Kővári, Anna Méhészné Kis, Henrikné Morvay and András Valaska;
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in regard to the remaining applicants in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 9 June 2022.
Attila Teplán Alena Poláčková Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings)
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant/household
(in euros) [1]
11193/21
29/01/2021
(64 applicants)
Gyöngyvér ANTALNÉ BOTÁR
1949Andrea BODOR
1976Gábor Csaba BODOR
1979István CSEKE
1962Lajos DOMBI
1943János ENDRÉSZ
1955Andrásné FEKETE
1954Péter FLÓDUNG
1946József FŐBUSZ
1938Attila GÁL
1949Jenő GÁL
1953Mihály GÉRCZEI
1948Árpád István GULYÁS
1948István HALÁSZ
1959Gyula HÁZI
1929Józsefné HORVÁTH
1944Lajosné KARDOS
1938József KASZONYI
1941Mária KELLÓNÉ MAJOR
1946Pál KÉRI
1950Sándor KERTÉSZ
1952Dóra Veronika KOVÁCS
1972Miklós LUKÁCS
1955László MIKÓ
1952János NÉMETH
1960László NÉMETH
1957Mihály OBBÁGY
1958Ottó PÁMER
1944Józsefné PAPP
1936Sándor PAPP
1965Klára PÁSZTORNÉ MÁLNÁSI
1967Miklósné PATAKI
1945János PÉCZI
1949Csaba PONGRÁCZ
1964György RÖVID
1966István SÁNKA
1956Ferenc STEFANITS
1959Nándor SÜLE
1956Albertné SZABÓ
1935András SZABÓ
1957Ferenc SZABÓ
1944József SZAKÁCS
1940Károly SZAMOSFALVI
1953József SZEMŐK [1]
1931Szilárd SZEMŐK [2]
1959Dezső SZIKRA
1945Vincéné TAKÁCS
1952Zsuzsanna TENDLINÉ CSEKE
1967Árpád TÓTH
1955Péter TRÁBERT
1953Rudolf TURZA
1956Judit UDVARDINÉ DR. ERDŐS
1950Józsefné VÍGH
1937Ferenc Péter VODNYÁNSZKY
1944Endre Ádám ZELENYÁNSZKI
1943Household
Endre József SZELE
1949Endréné SZELE
1953Applicants who withdrew their complaints :
Margit BÁBELNÉ DÁLNOKI
1958Ferenc BARNA
1956Lajos HONYÁK
1963István KŐVÁRI
1959Anna MÉHÉSZNÉ KIS
1959Henrikné MORVAY
1959András VALASKA
1945Bartos Ernő
Biatorbágy
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings
05/04/2022
06/04/2022
9,100
9,100
No award.
[1] Died on 24/08/2021. His heir is Szilárd Szemők.
[2] He is applicant in his own right and also as the heir of József Szemők.
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
