Lexploria

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÃœRKÄ°YE

(Applications nos. 20061/17 and 107 others)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

6 September 2022

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Bayram and Others v. Türkiye,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Pauliine Koskelo, President ,

Gilberto Felici,

Saadet Yüksel, judges , and Hasan Bakırcı , Section Registrar,

Having regard to:

the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and nine Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;

the decision to give notice of the applications to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye;

the parties’ observations;

the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;

Having deliberated in private on 28 June 2022,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terrorist Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of BaÅŸ v. Turkey , no. 66448/17, §§ 7 ‑ 14 and §§ 109-110, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time.

2. On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios , the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary, including members of high courts, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor’s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FETÖ/PDY, may be found in Baş , cited above, §§ 9-10 and 15-21).

3. Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş , cited above, § 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a “continuing offence” and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Baş , cited above, § 67, and Turan and Others v. Turkey , nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 30-31, 23 November 2021)

4. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and some were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.

5. In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia , the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (see Turan and Others , cited above, §§ 26 ‑ 27).

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT

6. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

7. The applicants complained that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors and section 46 of the Court of Cassation Act (Law no. 2797).

8. The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 55). The Court notes that the Government’s objections have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 57 ‑ 64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.

9. The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of BaÅŸ and Turan and Others (both cited above, §§ 143-158 and §§ 79 ‑ 96, respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (see BaÅŸ , cited above, §§ 115-116 and §§ 159 ‑ 162, and Turan and Others , cited above, § 91 and 95).

10. Applicant in application no. 53285/19 complained under Article 6 of the Convention of the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s written opinion during the proceedings before the Bakırköy Assize Court, where he had contested some restrictions imposed by the prison authorities. Furthermore, the applicant in application no. 47398/19 complained under Article 8 that the letters he sent from the prison were being registered on the National Judicial Network Server (UYAP).

11. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention (see, for instance, Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 33-71, 30 April 2013, and Günana and Others v. Turkey , nos. 70934/10 and 4 others, § 79, 20 November 2018).

12. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

13. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4, 5 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

14. The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.

15. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.

16. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102 ‑ 107), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 September 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Hasan Bakırcı Pauliine Koskelo Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of cases :

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant Date of Birth

Represented by

Applicant’s status at the time of pre-trial detention

1.

20061/17

Bayram v. Türkiye

23/02/2017

Mehmet BAYRAM 08/05/1975

Kadri Ä°NCE

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

2.

27433/17

Yaz v. Türkiye

27/02/2017

Burhan YAZ 17/03/1968

Elif EKÄ°CÄ°

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

3.

36899/17

Yalçın v. Türkiye

16/01/2017

Ali YALÇIN 01/06/1975

Cengiz ÇITAK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

4.

40719/17

Türkyılmaz v. Türkiye

27/03/2017

Muhammed TÃœRKYILMAZ 04/03/1988

Mustafa YILDIZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

5.

41664/17

Karaarslan v. Türkiye

27/04/2017

Yavuz KARAARSLAN 13/02/1972

Tuğba ÜSTÜNEL ÖZKAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

6.

41879/17

Kopal v. Türkiye

17/04/2017

Murat KOPAL 21/01/1981

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

7.

45028/17

Erşen v. Türkiye

26/05/2017

Serkan ERÅžEN 24/07/1980

Gökçehan SAĞLAM

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

8.

46942/17

Uğurlu v. Türkiye

15/03/2017

Mehmet UÄžURLU 31/07/1976

Mehmet ARI

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

9.

58972/17

Alanur v. Türkiye

20/04/2017

Hakkı Hakan ALANUR 12/11/1968

Åžakir HEPÄ°YÄ°LER

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

10.

61242/17

Beydili v. Türkiye

16/06/2017

Mustafa BEYDÄ°LÄ° 03/03/1988

Ä°mdat BERKSOY

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

11.

61647/17

Turgut v. Türkiye

30/05/2017

Salih TURGUT 10/05/1983

Süleyman DOĞRUER

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

12.

61652/17

Varol v. Türkiye

25/04/2017

Muhammet VAROL 02/05/1979

Ä°lyas TEKÄ°N

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

13.

61970/17

Demircan v. Türkiye

26/04/2017

Mustafa DEMÄ°RCAN 24/08/1976

Yasemin DEMÄ°RCAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

14.

62720/17

Pınar v. Türkiye

28/04/2017

Mehmet Erkan PINAR 01/01/1969

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

15.

62773/17

Gürses v. Türkiye

28/04/2017

UÄŸur GÃœRSES 25/01/1987

Ebubekir RENK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

16.

62774/17

Arkuntaş v. Türkiye

10/02/2017

Mesut ARKUNTAÅž 31/08/1973

Sefanur BOZGÖZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

17.

63579/17

Toprak v. Türkiye

25/05/2017

Ahmet TOPRAK 21/12/1990

Önder ÖZDERYOL

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

18.

63582/17

Şahin v. Türkiye

10/05/2017

Adil ÅžAHÄ°N 12/07/1985

Kamile KILDAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

19.

63622/17

Aburşu v. Türkiye

28/03/2017

Serdar ABURÅžU 20/08/1982

Tufan YILMAZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

20.

63712/17

Şişaneci v. Türkiye

20/04/2017

Mustafa ŞİŞANECİ 15/05/1983

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

21.

63740/17

Köse v. Türkiye

13/06/2017

Ahmet KÖSE 27/03/1982

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

22.

63784/17

Akkan v. Türkiye

29/05/2017

Bahattin AKKAN 10/09/1977

Fatih DÖNMEZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

23.

66359/17

Altun v. Türkiye

26/01/2017

Recep ALTUN 16/07/1976

Mehmet ÖNCÜ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

24.

66371/17

Soyal v. Türkiye

18/05/2017

Metin SOYAL 01/01/1973

Ahmet Can DEMÄ°RCÄ°

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

25.

70544/17

Tarhan v. Türkiye

27/07/2017

Kadir TARHAN 05/04/1982

Fatih DÖNMEZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

26.

70628/17

Özdemir v. Türkiye

21/08/2017

Hasan ÖZDEMİR 01/01/1984

Ahmet Can DEMÄ°RCÄ°

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

27.

70857/17

Güneş v. Türkiye

08/08/2017

Cuma GÃœNEÅž 17/01/1986

Özge ALTINTOP

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

28.

73516/17

Çelebi v. Türkiye

05/09/2017

Bülent ÇELEBİ 04/04/1974

Regaip DEMÄ°R

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

29.

82865/17

Ülkü v. Türkiye

03/11/2017

Musa ÜLKÜ 30/11/1972

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

30.

6613/18

Kayaalp v. Türkiye

16/01/2018

Selahattin KAYAALP 15/02/1987

Demet YÃœREKLÄ° KAYAALP

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

31.

14769/18

Yalçınöz v. Türkiye

25/07/2018

Bahadır YALÇINÖZ 19/02/1980

Barış ANTÜRK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

32.

17830/18

Aras v. Türkiye

04/04/2018

Bahattin ARAS 15/11/1977

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

33.

20047/18

Karaosmanoğlu v. Türkiye

06/03/2018

Mustafa KARAOSMANOÄžLU 15/08/1980

Åžerafettin AKTAÅž

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

34.

27587/18

Memiş v. Türkiye

22/05/2018

Yusuf MEMÄ°Åž 01/06/1966

Esad MEMÄ°Åž

Member of Court of Cassation

35.

40298/18

Duran v. Türkiye

16/08/2018

Eyüp Murat DURAN 04/02/1977

Ali DURGUN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

36.

52619/18

Gedikli v. Türkiye

26/10/2018

Halük GEDİKLİ 01/02/1969

Ä°rem TATLIDEDE

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

37.

54227/18

Kaya v. Türkiye

12/10/2018

Ä°lhan KAYA 03/08/1965

Yakup GÖNEN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

38.

11804/19

Şanal v. Türkiye

22/02/2019

Osman ÅžANAL 10/03/1972

Ali ALAGÖZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

39.

13253/19

Çakın v. Türkiye

26/02/2019

Akın ÇAKIN 11/07/1967

Ahmet Kerem ÇAKIN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

40.

20941/19

Gülbaş v. Türkiye

05/04/2019

Abdullah GÃœLBAÅž 03/10/1983

Halil Ä°brahim GÃœLBAÅž

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

41.

23663/19

Navruz v. Türkiye

22/04/2019

Yakup NAVRUZ 05/01/1981

Kamile KILDAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

42.

24746/19

Ertürk v. Türkiye

29/04/2019

Mustafa Celal ERTÃœRK 11/02/1968

OÄŸuz Emre ERTÃœRK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

43.

27944/19

Karabacak v. Türkiye

03/05/2019

Engin KARABACAK 23/12/1980

Ömer Faruk ERGÜN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

44.

28219/19

Evğün v. Türkiye

08/05/2019

Saniye EVĞÜN 25/01/1984

Emre AKARYILDIZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

45.

28260/19

Aydın v. Türkiye

03/05/2019

Sami AYDIN 08/01/1973

Ahmet OKU

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

46.

30433/19

Saatçıoğlu v. Türkiye

20/05/2019

Fuat SAATÇIOĞLU 08/03/1984

Fatma Vildan YÄ°RMÄ°BEÅžOÄžLU

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

47.

30652/19

Kurmaz v. Türkiye

16/05/2019

Harun KURMAZ 01/10/1981

Hatice YILDIZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

48.

31483/19

Karpuz v. Türkiye

21/05/2019

Ä°brahim KARPUZ 30/03/1973

AyÅŸe DURMUÅž

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

49.

31513/19

Temiz v. Türkiye

31/05/2019

Ömer TEMİZ 14/08/1980

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

50.

32201/19

Sarıkaya v. Türkiye

29/05/2019

Mustafa SARIKAYA 03/01/1987

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

51.

33924/19

Şahin v. Türkiye

14/06/2019

Mehmet ÅžAHÄ°N 03/12/1980

Nurcan BAL

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

52.

34034/19

Akıllı v. Türkiye

11/06/2019

Ä°lhan AKILLI 23/04/1980

Mustafa SOYLU

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

53.

34060/19

Sarı v. Türkiye

17/06/2019

Halil SARI 26/03/1990

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

54.

36029/19

Çelik v. Türkiye

25/06/2019

Hasan ÇELİK 01/10/1984

Ebubekir ÇELİK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

55.

36037/19

Bekar v. Türkiye

24/06/2019

Mustafa BEKAR 18/09/1984

Ebubekir RENK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

56.

36331/19

Aydın v. Türkiye

18/06/2019

Fatma Serpil AYDIN 22/07/1988

Mehmet Fatih İÇER

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

57.

36334/19

Şahin v. Türkiye

19/06/2019

Ä°lyas ÅžAHÄ°N 01/01/1976

Fatih DÖNMEZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

58.

36454/19

Karakaya v. Türkiye

26/06/2019

Mustafa KARAKAYA 12/03/1981

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

59.

36535/19

Tatar v. Türkiye

18/06/2019

Sinan TATAR 01/07/1989

Hanifi BAYRI

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

60.

36918/19

Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye

03/07/2019

Osman KILIÇASLAN 09/10/1978

Enes Malik KILIÇ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

61.

36941/19

Kara v. Türkiye

03/07/2019

Enis KARA 01/09/1981

Murat ÇAKAL

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

62.

36957/19

Alkan v. Türkiye

03/07/2019

Ömer Faruk ALKAN 08/05/1990

Rabia ALKAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

63.

37541/19

Cebre v. Türkiye

30/05/2019

Ayvaz CEBRE 30/07/1984

Ceren ATALAY

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

64.

38913/19

Akdoğan v. Türkiye

09/07/2019

Åžerife AKDOÄžAN 09/03/1989

Murat GÃœNDEM

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

65.

40674/19

Zengin v. Türkiye

20/07/2019

Ali Osman ZENGÄ°N 26/04/1971

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

66.

41521/19

Serli v. Türkiye

08/07/2019

Ufuk SERLÄ° 08/05/1985

Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

67.

44303/19

Çekiç v. Türkiye

09/08/2019

Mahmut ÇEKİÇ 23/10/1970

Ömer NAZLIM

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

68.

44341/19

Polat v. Türkiye

05/08/2019

Ä°smail POLAT 15/01/1974

Ä°lyas TEKÄ°N

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

69.

44464/19

Dönmez v. Türkiye

08/08/2019

Celalettin DÖNMEZ 15/12/1972

Fatih DÖNMEZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

70.

44529/19

Sağlam v. Türkiye

06/08/2019

Harun SAÄžLAM 15/06/1979

Gizay DULKADÄ°R

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

71.

46185/19

Kuzgun v. Türkiye

20/08/2019

Ersan KUZGUN 13/11/1984

Cebrail Eren KAYNAR

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

72.

46758/19

Aykaç v. Türkiye

26/08/2019

Fatih AYKAÇ 01/02/1975

MenekÅŸe Merve TEKTEN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

73.

47398/19

Yetim v. Türkiye

24/08/2019

Servet YETÄ°M 08/09/1971

Ä°zettin DEMÄ°R

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

74.

47483/19

Kurt v. Türkiye

15/08/2019

Sami KURT 18/02/1978

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

75.

50697/19

Ünlü v. Türkiye

28/08/2019

Erhan ÜNLÜ 01/09/1967

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

76.

50704/19

Demirci v. Türkiye

04/09/2019

Osman DEMÄ°RCÄ° 04/08/1972

Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

77.

51002/19

Takımsu v. Türkiye

27/08/2019

Mehmet TAKIMSU 01/11/1983

Kamile KILDAN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

78.

51180/19

Demirtaş v. Türkiye

23/08/2019

Murat DEMÄ°RTAÅž 15/10/1988

Hanifi BAYRI

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

79.

51768/19

Kızılyel v. Türkiye

03/09/2019

Serkan KIZILYEL 10/02/1979

Fatih Mehmet ADANIR

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

80.

51798/19

Müftüoğlu v. Türkiye

10/09/2019

Kamil MÃœFTÃœOÄžLU 10/08/1983

Cemal GELÄ°NCÄ°K

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

81.

52458/19

Öztürk v. Türkiye

25/09/2019

Özcan ÖZTÜRK 16/02/1982

Tolga Kaan PATAZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

82.

52774/19

Öztürk v. Türkiye

23/09/2019

Hakan ÖZTÜRK 20/03/1983

Emre AKARYILDIZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

83.

52792/19

Küçükkaya v. Türkiye

10/09/2019

Mukadder KÜÇÜKKAYA 26/02/1978

Mehmet MÄ°RZA

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

84.

53000/19

Karabidek v. Türkiye

27/09/2019

Mehmet KARABÄ°DEK 01/05/1971

Ä°rem TATLIDEDE

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

85.

53078/19

Karaca v. Türkiye

02/10/2019

Yalçın KARACA 01/01/1973

UÄŸur ALTUN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

86.

53172/19

Gönen v. Türkiye

27/09/2019

Fikret GÖNEN 21/05/1975

Yeşim KAYALI GÖNEN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

87.

53285/19

Beyazıt v. Türkiye

20/09/2019

Arzu BEYAZIT 28/03/1978

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

88.

53497/19

Koç v. Türkiye

09/10/2019

Ali KOÇ 22/07/1974

Hanifi BAYRI

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

89.

53539/19

Şahinkaya v. Türkiye

28/08/2019

Murat ÅžAHÄ°NKAYA 25/06/1982

Burcu AKYÃœZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

90.

53547/19

Ekinci v. Türkiye

28/08/2019

Mehmet EKÄ°NCÄ° 02/01/1988

Atıf DOĞUŞ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

91.

54194/19

Demirtaş v. Türkiye

11/10/2019

Nidai DEMÄ°RTAÅž 19/02/1979

İbrahim Menderes ÇÖLOVA

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

92.

54226/19

Güngör v. Türkiye

25/09/2019

Engin GÜNGÖR 06/01/1983

Elif Nurbanu OR

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

93.

56008/19

Kalaycı v. Türkiye

07/10/2019

Emrah KALAYCI 01/12/1981

Muhammet ATALAY

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

94.

56175/19

Avcı v. Türkiye

23/09/2019

Sadettin AVCI 04/01/1971

Emre AKARYILDIZ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

95.

56405/19

Uğurlu v. Türkiye

17/10/2019

Hüseyin UĞURLU 01/12/1975

Mehmet Fatih İÇER

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

96.

56568/19

Sarışık v. Türkiye

16/10/2019

Alper SARIÅžIK 10/05/1989

Hürriyet SÜMER KALA

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

97.

56778/19

Okur v. Türkiye

24/09/2019

Ä°brahim OKUR 29/12/1966

Mehmet ÖNCÜ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

98.

57719/19

Şahin v. Türkiye

25/10/2019

Ömer ŞAHİN 05/09/1982

Miraç TAMER

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

99.

58816/19

Hendek v. Türkiye

09/10/2019

Hasan HENDEK 15/01/1972

Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

100.

59635/19

Yeşil v. Türkiye

07/11/2019

Ufuk YEŞİL 16/09/1979

Merve Elif GÃœRACAR

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

101.

63404/19

Püsküllüoğlu v. Türkiye

25/11/2019

Mustafa PÃœSKÃœLLÃœOÄžLU 09/02/1984

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

102.

64701/19

Gün v. Türkiye

05/12/2019

Hüsnü GÜN 05/05/1985

Kübra DEMİRTAŞ

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

103.

1068/20

Özdemir v. Türkiye

17/12/2019

Erdal ÖZDEMİR 29/09/1981

Kubilay PARLAK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

104.

2167/20

Yılmaz v. Türkiye

10/12/2019

Ali Çetin YILMAZ 01/08/1976

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

105.

2511/20

Çolak v. Türkiye

26/12/2019

Ümit Zafer ÇOLAK 30/08/1974

Åžeyma SÃœMENGEN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

106.

6245/20

Ulusoy v. Türkiye

13/01/2020

Sinan ULUSOY 11/11/1977

Samet CAM

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

107.

6385/20

Çakmak v. Türkiye

09/01/2020

Ahmet Salim ÇAKMAK 14/04/1988

Kadriye TÃœMEN

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

108.

9017/20

Barut v. Türkiye

24/01/2020

Mehmet BARUT 27/03/1987 Esra BARUT 09/10/1989

Elkan ALBAYRAK

Ordinary judge or public prosecutor

Menu

CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE - [Turkish Translation] by Kadir Öztürk

CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE - [Turkish Translation] by Kadir Öztürk

LEXI