Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DUDEK v. POLAND
CASE OF GEERINGS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 554/2001 of 21 March 2001 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
CASE OF EBRAHIMIAN v. FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 131/2003 of 24 January 2003 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled long grain B rice to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2002
CASE OF KHMEL v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BRITANIŠKINA v. LITHUANIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 55/2014 of 21 January 2014 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 March 2014 to 31 May 2014
CASE OF VALDÍS FJÖLNISDÓTTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 270/2009 of 2 April 2009 concerning the authorisation of 6-phytase as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation DSM Nutritional Products Ltd represented by DSM Nutritional products Sp. Z o.o.) (Text with EEA relevance)

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CONSTANTIN TUDOR v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 43543/09 • ECHR ID: 001-120960

Document date: June 18, 2013

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 24

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

p unique documents citing • q citations total to S paragraphs

Outbound citations

fo unique documents cited • XS citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846