Lexploria

FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF ŢURLEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

( Application s no s . 25480/15 and 9 other application s - see appended list )

JUDGMENT

This version was rectified on 22 August 2019 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court

STRASBOURG

16 May 2019

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Ţurlea and Others v. Romania ,

The European Court of Human Rights ( Fourth Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Georges Ravarani , President, Marko Bošnjak , Péter Paczolay , judges , and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 25 April 2019 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table .

2. Notice of the applications was given to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention .

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

6. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

Article 3

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

7. The Court notes that the applicant s were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicant s ’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, MurÅ¡ić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96 ‑ 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see MurÅ¡ić , cited above, §§ 122 ‑ 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149 ‑ 159, 10 January 2012).

8. In the leading case of RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these applications. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant s ’ conditions of detention were inadequate.

10. These applications are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

11. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum s indicated in the appended table.

13. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Declares the applications admissible;

3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;

4. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant s , within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 May 2019 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani

Acting D eputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention ( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m. per inmate

Specific grievances

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]

25480/15

16/06/2015

Ștefan Ţurlea

01/01/1963

Ia ÅŸ i Prison

28/05/2009 to

01/06/2014

5 years and 5 days

Tulcea Prison

01/06/2014 to

30/11/2014

6 months

Rahova Prison

01/12/2014 to

01/03/2015

3 months and 1 day

Vaslui Prison

01/03/2015

pending

More than 4 years and 20 days

1.26 -1.98 m²

1.81-1.95 m²

1.95-2.79 m²

1.95 m²

Overcrowding, lack or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate furniture

Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture

5,000

49413/15

26/10/2015

Ion Mitu

12/04/1981

Oradea, Poarta Alb ă , Tulcea , Slobozia and Rahova Prisons

28/08/2008

pending

More than 10 years , 6 months and 21 days

1,76-2.09 m²

O vercrowding, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack or insufficient quantity of food, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water

5,000

51261/15

05/11/2015

J ozs ef Hendre [2]

08/03/1970

Represented by Augustin- Viorel Ţigan ,

Ceica

Oradea Prison

22/06/2012 to

16/10/2013

1 year , 3 months and 25 days

Satu Mare Prison 16/10/2013

pending

More than 5 years , 5 months and 5 days

1.9-2.88 m²

0.7-1.1 m²

O vercrowding, lack or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

O vercrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

5,000

53704/15

08/12/2015

Dan Perju

02/12/1961

Represented by Mirela-Olimpia Pușcă ,

Bârlad

B â rlad Police, Vaslui Police, Vaslui, Jilava and Ia ş i Prisons

22/08/2000

pending

More than 18 years , 6 months and 27 days

1.28-1.89 m²

B â rlad Police and Vaslui Police: overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food

Vaslui Prison: overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to shower, heavy smells from the chicken factory nearby, poor quality of food

Jilava and Ia ÅŸ i Prisons: overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food

5,000

57106/15

11/12/2015

Florian Ovidiu Gergely

19/08/1980

Miercurea Ciuc Prison

14/08/2014

pending

More than 4 years , 7 months and 7 days

2.05-2.54 m²

O vercrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, bunk beds, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

3,000

60729/15

02/02/2016

Florinel-Mircea Partin

14/06/1986

Miercurea Ciuc

Prison

31/05/2012

pending

More than 6 years , 9 months and 21 days

1.52-2.08 m²

O vercrowding, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

5,000

5693/16

09/05/2016

Mădălin Vasile

02/02/1983

Poarta Alb ă Prison

09/02/2015

pending

More than 4 years , 1 month and 12 days

1.51-2.72 m²

O vercrowding, bunk beds, insufficient number of sleeping places, l ack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities

3,000

11446/16

31/03/2016

Costel Crețu

02/04/1957

Jilava Prison

11/12/2014

pending

More than 4 years , 3 months and 10 days

1.52-2.34 m²

O vercrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of potable water, poor quality of food

3,000

12102/16

13/06/2016

Gyula Kaszoni

13/05/1962

Represented by Dan Alberto Pop,

Cluj-Napoca

Gherla Prison

21/01/2016

pending

More than 3 years and 2 months

1.98-2.94 m²

O vercrowding, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities, poor quality of food

3,000

59888/16

07/10/2016

Titel Antohe

09/07/1980

Represented by Ionela Mărgărit ,

Bucharest

Br ă ila Prison

18/12/2015

pending

More than 3 years , 3 months and 3 days

1.59-2.29 m²

O vercrowding, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

3,000

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

[2] 2. Rectified on 22 August 2019 : the text was: “ Joszef ”.

Menu

CASE OF ŢURLEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

CASE OF ŢURLEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

LEXI