FOUR TH SECTION

CASE OF PISÄ‚U AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

( Application no. 61145/15 and 13 others -

see appended list )

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

6 June 2019

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Pisău and Others v. Romania ,

The European Court of Human Rights ( Fourth Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Georges Ravarani, President, Marko Bošnjak, Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 16 May 2019 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table .

2. Notice of the application s was given to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention . In application no. 6670/16, the applicant also raised another complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. THE APPLICANTS ’ REQUESTS TO STRIKE-OUT PART OF APPLICATIONS NOS. 6670/16 AND 15699/16

6. By letter received on 20 December 2017, in application no. 6670/16, and by letter received on 11 July 2018, in application no. 15699/16, the applicants informed the Court that they had benefitted from the domestic compensatory remedy provided by Law no. 169/2017 and therefore asked the Court to strike-out the part of their applications covering the period of their detention after 24 July 2012 – the date from which the compensatory remedy automatically applied.

7. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of these parts of the applications. Accordingly, they should be struck out of the list of cases.

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

8. The applicant s complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

Article 3

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

9. The Court notes that the applicant s were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicant s ’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, MurÅ¡ić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96 - 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see MurÅ¡ić , cited above, §§ 122- 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149 -159, 10 January 2012).

10. In the leading case of RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

11. Having examined all the material submitted to it, as well as the Government ’ s objections concerning the continuous situation of the applicants ’ conditions of detention in some of the cases, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant s ’ conditions of detention were inadequate.

12. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

IV. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

13. In application no. 6670/16, the applicant also raised another complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.

14. The Court has examined this application and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, this complaint either does not meet the admissibili ty criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

V. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

15. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case - law (see, in particular, RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum s indicated in the appended table.

17. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Decides to strike part of applications nos. 6670/16 and 15699/16, covering their detention period after 24 July 2012, out of its list of cases;

3. Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and the remainder of the application no . 6670/16 inadmissible;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;

5. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant s , within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2019 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani

Acting D eputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Date of birth

Representative ’ s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m. per inmate

Specific grievances

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

61145/15

25/01/2016

Iulian Pisău

03/04/1983

Craiova Prison

18/07/2014 to 05/03/2019

4 years and 7 months and 16 days

1.1-2 m²

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents

3,000

6670/16

01/04/2016

Daniel Pană

02/10/1979

Giurgiu and Colibași Prisons

21/01/2011 to 24/07/2012

1 year and 6 months and 4 days

1.5-2.3 m²

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air

3,000

9300/16

31/05/2016

Mihai RoÅŸca

07/04/1972

Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Slobozia, Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons

05/08/2008 to 12/12/2016

8 years and 4 months and 8 days

1.2-2.4 m²

overcrowding (save for the period of 10/10/2012-19/03/2013), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, small courtyard

5,000

9365/16

29/06/2016

Petrișor-Marian Volintiru

13/06/1961

Dolj Police Inspectorate, Craiova, Jilava, Rahova and Pelendava Prisons, Jilava, Colibași, Dej and Rahova Prison Hospitals

19/04/2002 to 03/03/2017

14 years and 10 months and 13 days

1.2-2.3 m²

overcrowding (save for the period of 12/09/2014-03/11/2016), poor quality of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents

5,000

10914/16

12/02/2016

Alexandru Enache

19/11/1973

Nicoleta Mircioi

Bucharest

Jilava and Găești Prisons

26/09/2013 to 12/08/2015

1 year and 10 months and 18 days

1.1-2.7 m²

overcrowding (save for the period of 04/05-12/08/2015), poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water

3,000

15687/16

12/04/2016

Florentin Florea

02/12/1967

Craiova Prison

28/11/2015 to 26/01/2017

1 year and 1 month and 30 days

1.4-1.9 m²

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities

3,000

15699/16

31/05/2016

Constantin-Lucian Spînu

30/12/1973

Bucharest Police Section no. 13 and no. 6, Jilava Prison Hospital, Rahova, Jilava, Colibași and Giurgiu Prisons

16/01/2006 to 24/07/2012

6 years and 6 months and 9 days

1.4-2.6 m²

overcrowding (save for the periods of 24/01-13/04/2007, 30/03-24/07/2012), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or inadequate furniture, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient natural light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature

5,000

25740/16

13/07/2016

Petrişor-Mihai Atincăi

29/10/1985

Iași Prison

26/04/2007 to 20/10/2016

9 years and 5 months and 25 days

Iași Prison

08/03/2018 – pending

More than 1 year and 1 months and 4 days

1.2-2.1 m²

1.2 m²

overcrowding (save for the periods of 31/08-05/09/2011, 28/01-02/02/2014, 16-26/05/2014, 11-15/12/2015), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower

5,000

32529/16

27/05/2016

Angelo Petrovici

30/12/1998

BuziaÈ™ Minors Education Centre

25/03/2015 to 06/06/2016

1 year and 2 months and 13 days

2.9 m²

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, small courtyard

3,000

33999/16

09/07/2016

Gheorghe Vasile

02/01/1979

Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova, Jilava and Giurgiu Prisons

19/03/2013 to 08/05/2017

4 years and 1 months and 20 days

1.3-2 m²

overcrowding (save for the periods of 21/10/2013-16/11/2015, 20/11/2015-08/09/2016, 26/09/2016-08/05/2017), poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, small courtyard

3,000

39944/16

12/08/2016

Marius Nicolae

14/12/1982

Dolj Police Inspectorate, Craiova, Jilava, Rahova, Slobozia, Poarta Albă, Ploiești, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Mărgineni, Miercurea Ciuc, Pelendava and Vânjuleț Prisons

30/12/2004 to 19/12/2016

11 years and 11 months and 20 days

1.2-2.8 m²

overcrowding (save for the period of 15/01-28/05/2015), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, inadequate temperature

5,000

40858/16

11/10/2016

Adrian-Mihai Pavel

07/11/1980

Irina Maria Peter

Bucharest

Rahova, Giurgiu, Mărgineni and Colibași Prisons

20/02/2008 to 07/06/2017

9 years and 3 months and 19 days

1.3-2.9 m²

overcrowding (save for the periods of 16-21/04/2008, 04/05-02/06/2015, 30/06/2015-07/03/2016, 14/03-14/07/2016), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate furniture, inadequate temperature

5,000

43685/16

15/07/2016

Gheorghe Grigore

01/01/1958

Diana-Elena Dragomir

Bucharest

Colibași Prison

15/01/2016 to 21/02/2017

1 year and 1 month and 7 days

1.8-2.7 m²

overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen

3,000

1916/17

19/12/2016

Gheorghe-Mirel Firoiu

22/03/1983

Vâlcea Police Inspectorate, Colibași, Jilava, Rahova and Târgu Jiu Prisons

27/02/2004 to 13/12/2016

12 years and 9 months and 17 days

2 m²

overcrowding (save for the period of 22/08/2013-13/12/2016), lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

5,000

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.