Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KARALI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 14154/10, 14189/10, 14198/10, 14206/10, 14211/10, 14218/10, 14225/10, 25488/10, 26827/10, 26832/10, ... • ECHR ID: 001-127238

Document date: September 17, 2013

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

KARALI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 14154/10, 14189/10, 14198/10, 14206/10, 14211/10, 14218/10, 14225/10, 25488/10, 26827/10, 26832/10, ... • ECHR ID: 001-127238

Document date: September 17, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 14154/10 Ramazan KARALI against Turkey

and 14 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 17 September 2013 as a Committee composed of:

Peer Lorenzen, President, András Sajó, Nebojša Vučinić, judges and Atilla Nalbant , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications, listed in the Appendix,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix.

A. The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts.

B. Relevant domestic law

A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür Turgut and Others ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013).

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time.

Certain applicants also complained that excessive length of c ivil proceedings brought against them amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given the similarity of the facts and of the legal issues raised.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings was incompatible within the ‘‘ reasonable time ’’ requirement, laid down in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...”

The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings was incompatible with the principle of the ‘‘ reasonable time ’’ requirement in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. In that respect, the Court found in Müdür Turgut and Others ((dec.), cited above, §§ 58 and 60) that the Compensation Commission established by Law no. 6384, insofar as it is accessible and capable of offering reasonable prospects of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings constituted a remedy which applicants were required to exhaust for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law no. 6384.

It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

Having carefully examined the applicants ’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession , and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence , the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.

It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Atilla Nalbant Peer Lorenzen Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No

Application No

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

Notes

14154/10

09/02/2010

Ramazan KARALI

13/04/1943

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991 / 22

14189/10

09/02/2010

Mustafa YILDIRIM

01/07/1953

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

14198/10

09/02/2010

Sinan İGAÇ

11/12/1958

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

14206/10

09/02/2010

Mehmet BÜYÜKÇAY

13/03/1933

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

14211/10

09/02/2010

Mustafa KARÄžIN

01/01/1950

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

14218/10

09/02/2010

Mustafa KARA

01/01/1949

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

14225/10

09/02/2010

Mehmet YILDIRIM

01/07/1956

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1991/22

25488/10

19/04/2010

Saadet KARACA

01/07/1962

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1984/3

26827/10

19/04/2010

Ömer GÜNGEN

20/04/1949

Şanlıurfa

Abdurrahman

ÖZB İLGİ Ç

20/12/1956

Şanlıurfa

İbrahim

ÇAKAL

03/03/1940

Siverek

M ustafa

AY

30/07/1958

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1989/23

26832/10

19/04/2010

Celal KARACA

01/07/1944

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E : 1984/3

53052/10

19/04/2010

Salih KARACA

04/08/1941

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1984/3

64958/10

08/10/2010

Hüseyin ERİK

01/01/1949

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1975/42 K: 2007/7

68576/10

08/10/2010

Cuma COÅžKUN

01/01/1948

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1975/42 K: 2007/7

69799/10

08/10/2010

Zini ERİK

01/01/1949

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1975/42 K: 2007/7

69802/10

08/10/2010

Devriş ERİK

01/01/1955

Şanlıurfa

Yılmaz KANBALI

Siverek Cadastral Court, E: 1975/42 K: 2007/7

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846