LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
SERPOKRYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 13970/10;9409/11;19302/11;59998/11;66358/11;50818/13;54158/13;74608/13;78449/13;65943/14 • ECHR ID: 001-167526
Document date: September 15, 2016
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
SERPOKRYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 13970/10;9409/11;19302/11;59998/11;66358/11;50818/13;54158/13;74608/13;78449/13;65943/14 • ECHR ID: 001-167526
Document date: September 15, 2016
Cited paragraphs only
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 13970/10 Aleksandr Grigoryevich SERPOKRYLOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 September 2016 as a Committee composed of:
Helena Jäderblom , President, Dmitry Dedov , Branko Lubarda , judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants ’ replies to these declarations,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.
The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.
The Government acknowledged the excessive length of pre-trial detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list .
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .
Done in English and notified in writing on 6 October 2016 .
Hasan Bakırcı Helena Jäderblom Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth /
Date of registration
Representative name and location
Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law
Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration
Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros) [i]
13970/10
15/02/2010
Aleksandr Grigoryevich SERPOKRYLOV
10/01/1983
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention
29/04/2016
01/07/2016
3,400
9409/11
25/01/2011
Vasiliy Grigoryevich BUDNOV
14/06/1984
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention
02/02/2016
14/06/2016
2,500
19302/11
28/02/2011
Artem Sergeyevich LAPTEV
09/06/1988
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention
22/01/2016
22/06/2016
1,650
59998/11
01/08/2011
Koba Anzoriyevich BREGVADZE
07/06/1977
03/02/2016
22/06/2016
1,600
66358/11
21/09/2011
Aleksandr Alekseyevich KIM
09/09/1958
Maklin Aleksandr Anatolyevich
Tula
03/02/2016
22/06/2016
1,400
50818/13
19/07/2013
Gadzhiragim Gasan Ogly ASKEROV
06/11/1964
01/06/2016
01/08/2016
5,850
54158/13
24/07/2013
Magomedveli Masanovich EMINOV
02/02/1960
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention
03/02/2016
22/06/2016
3,200
74608/13
05/11/2013
Denis Aleksandrovich ANIKIN
27/02/1980
Shvechkova Natalya Aleksandrovna
St Petersburg
01/06/2016
07/07/2016
2,050
78449/13
04/12/2013
Ivan Sergeyevich BELOUSOV
26/02/1987
Stavitskaya Anna Edvarovna
Moscow
29/04/2016
04/07/2016
1,400
65943/14
19/09/2014
Yevgeniy Vladimirovich KARABULIN
24/12/1980
27/05/2016
11/07/2016
4,600
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
