Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MOMOT v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 40132/19 • ECHR ID: 001-208796

Document date: February 18, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

MOMOT v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 40132/19 • ECHR ID: 001-208796

Document date: February 18, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 40132/19 Denys Yuriyovych MOMOT against Ukraine

(s ee appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 18 February 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Ivana Jelić , President, Ganna Yudkivska , Arnfinn Bårdsen , judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 July 2019,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant ’ s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) .

THE LAW

Complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention (excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)

In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court notes that the domestic proceedings lasted about five years and seven months before three levels of jurisdiction (see the appended table) which cannot be considered excessive, in particular as the applicant and his lawyer failed to appear at certain court hearings.

Thus, the Court finds that the applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

Moreover, since the applicant ’ s complaints under Article 6 § 1 are inadmissible, it follows that he has no “arguable claim” of a violation of his rights under Article 6 § 1 for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention. Consequently, this complaint is also manifestly ill-founded.

In view of the above, the Court finds that the application is inadmissible and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Declares the application inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 11 March 2021 .

             {signature_p_2}

Liv Tigerstedt Ivana Jelić Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention

( excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law )

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant ’ s name

Year of birth

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Levels of jurisdiction

40132/19

17/07/2019

Denys Yuriyovych MOMOT

1991

05/02/2014

21/08/2019

5 years and 6 months and 17 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846