THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 39492/09 Tatyana Viktorovna YEGOROVA against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7 February 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Helen Keller, President, Pere Pastor Vilanova , Alena Poláčková , judges,

and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 June 2009,

Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government on 8 July 2016 requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant ’ s reply to that declaration,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Ms Tatyana Viktorovna Yegorova , is a Russian national, who was born in 1946 and lives in Serpukhov, the Moscow Region. She was represented before the Court by Mr V. Veselov , a lawyer practising in Serpukhov.

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about delayed enforcement on 1 June 2009 of the domestic court ’ s judgment of 19 May 2005 obliging a local municipal unitary enterprise to carry out repairs on her flat and under Article 13 about the lack of an effective remedy.

The application was communicated to the Government.

On 8 July 2016 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by the application.

They acknowledged a violation of the applicant ’ s rights guaranteed by the Convention and undertook to pay the applicant 1,500 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, would be free of any taxes that may be applicable and would be converted into the national currency of the Russian Federation at the rate applicable on the date of payment. The payment would be effected within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay within that period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. They further requested the Court to strike out the application.

On 6 September 2016 the Court received a letter from the applicant informing the Court that she had agreed to the terms of the Government ’ s declaration.

THE LAW

The Court finds that following the applicant ’ s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government the case should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases pursuant to Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 9 March 2017 .

FatoÅŸ Aracı Helen Keller              Deputy Registrar President