LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
DINU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 14098/15;59001/15;12941/16;19620/16 • ECHR ID: 001-200645
Document date: December 12, 2019
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
DINU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Doc ref: 14098/15;59001/15;12941/16;19620/16 • ECHR ID: 001-200645
Document date: December 12, 2019
Cited paragraphs only
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 14098/15 Cătălin Laurențiu DINU against Romania and 3 other applications (see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12 December 2019 as a Committee composed of:
Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström , President, Georges Ravarani , Jolien Schukking , judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application s lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) , who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations.
By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants ’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to p ursue the applications (Article 37 § 1(a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 16 January 2020 .
Liv Tigerstedt Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
( inadequate conditions of detention )
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Date of birth
Date of the
Court ’ s registered
letter
Date of receipt of
the registered letter
Time-limit for submission
by the applicant of the
information requested
14098/15
15/04/2015
Cătălin Laurențiu DINU
07/11/1976
21/08/2019
Returned to the Court as unclaimed on 11/09/2019
02/10/2019
59001/15
03/03/2016
Giani -Cristian ȚENCUȘE
15/02/1980
07/08/2019
Returned to the Court as
“recipient moved” on 19/08/2019
18/09/2019
12941/16
16/05/2016
Cristinel MIHAI
11/07/1985
16/07/2019
24/07/2019
16/09/2019
19620/16
22/06/2016
Florin RÄ‚DULESCU
01/07/1957
21/08/2019
06/09/2019
02/10/2019
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
