Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 67/2009 of 23 January 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF PAVLENKO v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MALINVERNI
Council Regulation (EC) No 486/2006 of 20 March 2006 concerning the implementation of the Agreement on Duty-Free Treatment of Multi-Chip Integrated Circuits (MCPs) by amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EC) No 282/98 of 3 February 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND 8 OTHER CASES AGAINST RUSSIA
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 2)PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF KASPAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 134/2002 of 22 January 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2531/98 concerning the application of minimum reserves by the European Central Bank
CASE OF MAGGIO AND OTHERS AGAINST ITALY AND 2 OTHER CASES

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MAYZIT v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 63378/00 • ECHR ID: 001-68067

Document date: January 20, 2005

Inbound citations: 174
•
Cited paragraphs: 17
•
Outbound citations: 15

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

uxv unique documents citing • lhx citations total to 0v paragraphs

Outbound citations

J unique documents cited • Dt citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846