Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF YAKIS v. TURKEY
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ IN RESPECT OF THE COMPLAINT UNDER ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
Council Regulation (EC) No 2248/2001 of 19 November 2001 on certain procedures for applying the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia, of the other part and for applying the Interim Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia
CASE OF ALMAŠI v. SERBIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
CASE OF CHAPUS v. FRANCE
CASE OF KOCAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 42/98 of 8 January 1998 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice
Commission Regulation (EC) No 232/2003 of 6 February 2003 fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 901/2002
Règlement (CEE) n 2008/68 de la Commission, du 11 décembre 1968, fixant les restitutions à l'exportation pour le sucre blanc et le sucre brut en l'état
CASE OF PERUŠKO AGAINST CROATIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF PABLA KY v. FINLAND

Doc ref: 47221/99 • ECHR ID: 001-61829

Document date: June 22, 2004

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 8

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

g unique documents citing • T citations total to A paragraphs

Outbound citations

c unique documents cited • S citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846