Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TRYMBACH v. UKRAINEJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S SPIELMANN, POWER-FORDE AND BUROMENSKIY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1056/91 of 25 April 1991 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 532/87 of 23 February 1987 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2681/83 laying down detailed rules for the application of the subsidy system for oil seeds
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2603/1999 of 9 December 1999 laying down rules for the transition to the rural development support provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999
CASE OF NASRI v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WILDHABER
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 21/93 of 8 January 1993 fixing the import levies on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF POJATINA v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOSKELO
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 February 1996. Criminal proceedings against Gianfranco Perfili.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 1990. FUNOC v Commission of the European Communities.
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2011. ISD Polska sp. z o.o. and Others v European Commission.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2005. Mobistar SA v Commune de Fléron (C-544/03) and Belgacom Mobile SA v Commune de Schaerbeek (C-545/03).

C-544/03 • 62003CJ0544 • ECLI:EU:C:2005:518

Inbound citations: 43
•
Cited paragraphs: 11
•
Outbound citations: 24

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

pA unique documents citing • KV citations total to Ry paragraphs

Outbound citations

wU unique documents cited • Sx citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846