Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 800/80 of 31 March 1980 indicating the basic products which do not benefit from the advance payment of export refunds
CASE OF GRAFESCOLO S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management (Text with EEA relevance)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1089/2004 of 10 June 2004 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 8 November 2012. Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1260/89 of 8 May 1989 concerning the classification of certain goods within the combined nomenclature
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 508/77 of 11 March 1977 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF PODBELŠEK BRAČIČ v. SLOVENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PEJCHAL
CASE OF KUDREVIČIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASES OF MILATOVÁ AND OTHERS AND EXEL AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2013. Stoilov i Ko EOOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna.

C-180/12 • 62012CJ0180 • ECLI:EU:C:2013:693

Inbound citations: 32
•
Cited paragraphs: 13
•
Outbound citations: 32

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

sk unique documents citing • 9m citations total to ox paragraphs

Outbound citations

gw unique documents cited • qN citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846