Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VILHENA PERES SANTOS LANCA THEMUDO E MELO AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024. AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.
CASE OF ÇAVUŞ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013. European Commission v Czech Republic.
CASE OF VALVERDE DIGON v. SPAINJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES RAVARANI, RANZONI AND GUYOMAR
CASE OF SAMPAIO DE LEMOS AND OTHER “AGRARIAN REFORM” CASES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF KANAYEV v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021. VK v An Bord Pleanála.
Regulation (EEC) No 1265/69 of the Commission of 1 July 1969 establishing methods for determining the quality of sugar bought in by intervention agencies
Thirty-ninth Commission Directive 82/91/EEC of 15 January 1982 amending the Annexes to Council Directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015. Holterman Ferho Exploitatie BV and Others v F.L.F. Spies von Büllesheim.

C-47/14 • 62014CJ0047 • ECLI:EU:C:2015:574

Inbound citations: 67
•
Cited paragraphs: 26
•
Outbound citations: 134

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

fg unique documents citing • vf citations total to 1n paragraphs

Outbound citations

Kx unique documents cited • zhm citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846