Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PODBELŠEK BRAČIČ v. SLOVENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PEJCHAL
CASE OF KUDREVIČIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASES OF MILATOVÁ AND OTHERS AND EXEL AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3676/83 of 23 December 1983 authorizing the conclusion of long-term private storage contracts for certain table wines for the 1983/84 wine year
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 May 2015. Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden.
McLEOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF Mr. C.L. ROZAKIS
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 34/86 of 8 January 1986 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF BUSCEMI v. ITALYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BONELLO
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016. HeidelbergCement AG v European Commission.
CASE OF ZAMECNIKOVA AND ZAMECNIK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2010. Artegodan GmbH v European Commission.

• 62005TJ0429 • ECLI:EU:T:2010:60

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 46

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

a7 unique documents cited • Bs citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846