Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF E.S. v. ROMANIA AND BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
CASE OF HADŽIĆ AND SULJIĆ AGAINST BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 22/89 of 5 January 1989 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 January 2019. Pina Cipollone v Ministero della Giustizia.
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAPARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 October 2000. The Queen v H.M. Treasury, ex parte The University of Cambridge.
CASE OF PAPACHELAS v. GREECEPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TULKENS
CASE OF CUMHURİYETÇİ EĞİTİM VE KÜLTÜR MERKEZİ VAKFI v. TURKEY
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
Judgment of the Court of 20 January 1993. Emerald Meats Ltd v Commission of the European Communities.

Document text Analytics

Order of the Court of 8 March 1991.

Emerald Meats Ltd v Commission of the European Communities.

C-66/91 et 66/91 R • 61991CO0066 • ECLI:EU:C:1991:110

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 17

Keywords

Inadmissibility.

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

v unique documents cited • L1 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846