Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MALINVERNI
CASE OF SİNİM v. TURKEYJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES SPANO AND BIANKU
CASE OF MARPA ZEELAND B.V. AND METAL WELDING B.V. AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2001 of 28 March 2001 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2000. Idéal tourisme SA v Belgian State.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 494/2013 of 29 May 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2599/85 of 16 September 1985 amending for the fifth time Regulation (EEC) No 3800/81 determining the classification of vine varieties
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2000. Alfredo Albore.

Document text Analytics

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2013.

Team Relocations NV and Others v European Commission.

C-444/11 P-REC • 62011CO0444 • ECLI:EU:C:2013:656

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 4

Keywords

Rectification of a judgment.

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

M unique documents cited • k citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846