Browsing history:

↳
FINSKA FÖRSAMLINGEN I STOCKHOLM AND HAUTANIEMI v. SWEDEN
CASE OF PRAMSTALLER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2146/94 of 31 August 1994 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
CASE OF LAZORIVA v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
CASE OF CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. UKRAINE
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 392/98 of 18 February 1998 fixing the agricultural conversion rates
L.C.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMOPINION CONCORDANTE DE M. I. CABRAL BARRETO
Order of the Court (First Chamber), 3 April 2014. Katalin Sebestyén v Zsolt Csaba Kővári and Others.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3131/81 of 28 October 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 19.08 B of the Common Customs Tariff
Judgment of the Court of 14 July 1994. Paola Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 August 2018. Administratīvā rajona tiesa v Ministru kabinets.

C-120/17 • 62017CJ0120 • ECLI:EU:C:2018:638

Inbound citations: 27
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 104

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

w unique documents citing • N8 citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

Ap unique documents cited • B9P citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846