Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KARASTELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 November 2012. Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt. v Plastinnova 2000 Kft.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 97/82 of 18 January 1982 fixing the sluice-gate prices and levies for pigmeat
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022. WT v European Commission.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2345/86 of 25 July 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1726/82 determining intervention centres for colza, rape and sunflower seed
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 419/92 of 20 February 1992 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
CASE OF BUCIAŞ v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE Å IKUTA
CASE OF ZINATULLIN v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
CASE OF BAHADDAR v. THE NETHERLANDSDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 January 1998. Henia Babahenini v Belgian State.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 17 january 2013.

European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.

C-360/11 • 62011CJ0360 • ECLI:EU:C:2013:17

Inbound citations: 42
•
Cited paragraphs: 19
•
Outbound citations: 33

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Sk unique documents citing • f4 citations total to Qe paragraphs

Outbound citations

Gj unique documents cited • Yr citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846