CASE OF EGELAND AND HANSEID v. NORWAYCONCURRING OPINION OF JU D GE MALINVERNI
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: April 16, 2009
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
CONCURRING OPINION OF JU D GE MALINVERNI
(Translation)
[1] Italics added.
[2] Italics added.
[3] W.J. Ganshof van der Meersch , “ Le caractère autonome des termes et l a marge nationale des gouvernements dans l’interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme ” , in Mélanges G. Wiarda , Köln , 1990, p. 17; R. St. MacDonald, “ The margin of appreciation ” , in R. St. MacDonald, F. Matscher and H. Petzold , The European System for the Protection of Human Rights , Dordrecht, 1993, p. 93; P. Lambert, “ Marge nationale d’appréciation et contrôle de proportionnalité ” , in F. Sudre , L’interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme , Bru ssels , 1998, p. 64; J. Callewaert, “ Quel avenir pour le marge d’appréciation ? ” in Mélanges R. Ryssdal , Köln , 2000, pp. 147-166.
[4] See the judgment in Ireland v . the United Kingdom , 18 January 1978, Series A n o. 25 § 207.
[5] See, for example, the judgment in Rasmussen v . Denmark , 28 November 1984, S eries A n o. 87, § 41; Handyside v . the United Kingdom , 7 December 1976 , S e rie s A n o. 24, § 48.
[6] See the judgment in Otto Preminger Institut v . Au s tri a , 20 September 1994, S e rie s A n o. 295-A, § 50.
[7] See the judgment in Fretté v . France , 26 February 2002, Re ports 2002-I, § 59.
[8] See, for example, the judgment in Buckley v . the United Kingdom , 25 September 1996, Rec. 1996-VI, § 74, o r Laskey , Jaggard and Brown v . the United Kingdom , 19 February 1997, Rec. 1997-I, § 42.
[9] See the judgment in Dudgeon v . the United Kingdom , 22 October 1981, Series A n o. 45.
[10] See the judgment in B. and Others v. the United Kingdom , 8 July 1987, Series A, n o. 21.
[11] See the judgment in Z. v . Finland , 25 February 1997, Re ports 1997-II.
[12] See the judgment in S unday Times v . the United Kingdom (N o. 1) , 26 April 1979, Series A, n o. 30, §§ 65 et seq. ; and Castells v . Spain , 23 April 1992, Series A, n o. 236, § 43.
[13] See the judgment in United Communist Party of Turkey v . Tur key , 30 January 1998, Re ports 1998-I.
[14] See the judgments in Fre ss oz and Roire v . France [GC], § 45, 1999-I , and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . Nor way , Re ports 1999-III, § 59 .