Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES
CASE OF GLASS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
Council Regulation (EEC) No 777/87 of 16 March 1987 modifying the intervention arrangements for butter and skimmed-milk powder
CASE OF NEGULESCU v. ROMANIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES PASTOR VILANOVA AND SCHUKKING
LUBELSKA FABRYKA MASZYN I NARZEDZI ROLNICZYCH 'PLON' AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 200/94 of 31 January 1994 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
CASE OF ŘÍMSKOKATOLICKÁ FARNOST OBŘÍSTVÍ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1181/92 of 7 May 1992 fixing the import levies on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF GENTILHOMME, SCHAZFF-BENHADJI AND ZEROUKI v. FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1333/2001 of 2 July 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 July 2025.

DO v European Central Bank.

• 62024TJ0180 • ECLI:EU:T:2025:758

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 39

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

u unique documents cited • a9 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846