Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SKUPSKAS v. GERMANY

Doc ref: 53320/19 • ECHR ID: 001-231167

Document date: January 18, 2024

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SKUPSKAS v. GERMANY

Doc ref: 53320/19 • ECHR ID: 001-231167

Document date: January 18, 2024

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 53320/19 Donaldas SKUPSKAS against Germany

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 18 January 2024 as a Committee composed of:

Faris Vehabović , President , Anja Seibert-Fohr, Anne Louise Bormann , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 2 October 2019,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant was represented by Ms A. Oehmichen, lawyer practising in Berlin.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning inability to cross-examine a witness and to obtain the summoning and interrogation of another witness were communicated to the German Government (“the Government”).

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Germany in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 8 February 2024.

Viktoriya Maradudina Faris Vehabović Acting Deputy Section Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

(in euros) [1]

Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application

(in euros) [2]

53320/19

02/10/2019

Donaldas SKUPSKAS

1987

Oehmichen Anna

Berlin

06/12/2023

06/12/2023

9,000

9,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

[2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846