LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 51074/21, 51093/21, 51102/21, 51112/21, 51254/21, 51375/21, 51408/21, 51480/21, 52733/21, 53159/21, ... • ECHR ID: 001-229328
Document date: December 7, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 10
CASE OF AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 51074/21, 51093/21, 51102/21, 51112/21, 51254/21, 51375/21, 51408/21, 51480/21, 52733/21, 53159/21, ... • ECHR ID: 001-229328
Document date: December 7, 2023
Cited paragraphs only
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 51074/21 and 35 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
7 December 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Azizov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland , President , Frédéric Krenc, Davor DerenÄinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Conventionâ€) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Governmentâ€) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see KudreviÄius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey , no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic societyâ€.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13 . Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia , no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further complaints under Article 6 of the Convention alleging various aspects of unfairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
{signature_p_1} {signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros) [1]
51074/21
13/10/2021
Yegor Olegovich AZIZOV
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51093/21
13/10/2021
Nil Aleksandrovich KOCHETOV
1979
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51102/21
13/10/2021
Denis Konstantinovich DOLGOPOLOV
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51112/21
13/10/2021
Anton Vladimirovich KUPRIYENKO
1985
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51254/21
08/10/2021
Yevgeniy Alekseyevich VOLKOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51375/21
08/10/2021
Roman Vitalyevich GREBENSHCHIKOV
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5.40 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51408/21
08/10/2021
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich FILIPENKO
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.40 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51480/21
08/10/2021
Alina Vasilyevna KOTCHENKO
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Bryansk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Bryansk Regional Court
08/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
52733/21
15/10/2021
Aleksandra Aleksandrovna SVESHNIKOVA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
16/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 03/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53159/21
04/10/2021
Denis Aleksandrovich VINOGRADOV
1984
Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
08/10/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53160/21
23/09/2021
Ruslan Rafisovich DEVYATOV
2001
Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
15/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 01/03/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53226/21
08/10/2021
Natalya Alekseyevna ARSHINOVA
1975
Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Samara
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
08/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53231/21
08/10/2021
Darya Sergeyevna KOVYRSHINA
Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
53265/21
12/10/2021
Yelena Vitalyevna KUROCHKINA
1977
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally against tree felling
Moscow
27/12/2020
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 27/12/2020 until 2 p.m. on 29/12/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53759/21
22/10/2021
Valentin Romanovich KANUNNIKOV
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 7 days
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
53766/21
22/10/2021
Maksim Yuryevich GOLYSHEV
1972
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53771/21
22/10/2021
Aleksey Vladimirovich KHARITONOV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53887/21
22/10/2021
Mikhail Vladimirovich SVECHNIKOV
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53911/21
25/10/2021
Savva Gennadyevich GORDEYEV
1983
Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53961/21
22/10/2021
Roman Sergeyevich DMITRIYEV
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53976/21
22/10/2021
Grigoriy Dmitriyevich SAFRONOV
1985
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 12 days
Moscow City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021.
5,000
53988/21
17/10/2021
Konstantin Vasilyevich SIDOROV
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 7.45 p.m. on 02/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
53990/21
22/10/2021
Vasiliy Vladimorovich ARAPOV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
detention of 9 days
Moscow City Court
07/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 27/04/2021 until 11.30 a.m. on 28/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
54110/21
19/10/2021
Nikita Vitalyevich FOMICHEV
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54224/21
19/10/2021
Nurlan Seytekereyevich SULTANOV
1989
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Saratov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Saratov Regional Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54337/21
19/10/2021
Anton Yevgenyevich ANDRIANOV
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
22/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54350/21
20/10/2021
Andrey Viktorovich ALMAZOV
2002
Dmitriy Sergeyevich Dimitriyev
Orenburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Orenburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Orenburg Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
54355/21
20/10/2021
Pavel Andreyevich ANNIKOV
1992
Dmitriy Sergeyevich Dimitriyev
Orenburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Orenburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Orenburg Regional Court
20/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
54436/21
27/10/2021
Andrey Vasilyevich SHCHUROV
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 5 days
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
54443/21
27/10/2021
Denis Vladimirovich VASILYEV
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
16/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54446/21
27/10/2021
Viktoriya Aleksandrovna DANILOVA
2002
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of Tatarstan
26/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 11.00 a.m. on 22/04/2021.
4,000
54452/21
27/10/2021
Pavel Aleksandrovich MURASHEV
1994
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.00 a.m. on 10/02/2021, which is the period over 10 days;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
54821/21
29/10/2021
Vadim Olegovich ANISIMOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ulyanovsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Ulyanovsk Regional Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54824/21
28/10/2021
Igor Olegovich ANISIMOV
1992
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ulyanovsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Ulyanovsk Regional Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54825/21
28/10/2021
Vladislav Olegovich BELYAYEV
1972
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54846/21
28/10/2021
Aleksandr Nikolayevich KURAKIN
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
