Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF THANZA v. ALBANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: July 4, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF THANZA v. ALBANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: July 4, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGHIDES

While I agree with points 1, 3 and 7 of the operative provisions of the judgment, as regards points 2, 4, 5, 6 and 8, rather than issuing a fully-fledged separate opinion or voting anonymously against these points, I have chosen to append this “bare statement of dissent”. This is a mere statement of disagreement with part of the judgment, one of the means of expressing dissent to which judges are entitled under Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846