Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BEVZA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 45323/20 • ECHR ID: 001-224424

Document date: March 23, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

BEVZA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 45323/20 • ECHR ID: 001-224424

Document date: March 23, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 45323/20 Dmytro Leonidovych BEVZA

against Ukraine

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 23 March 2023 as a Committee composed of:

Mārtiņš Mits , President , Mattias Guyomar, Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 October 2020,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant was represented by Mr S.O. Kulbach, a lawyer practising in Limoges.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”).

THE LAW

The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 of the Convention are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings was not excessive or unreasonable.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

The Court, having found the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention inadmissible, concludes that the applicant has no arguable claim for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention (see Rodić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 22893/05, § 82, 27 May 2008). The applicant’s complaint under Article 13 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 6 of the Convention is thus likewise manifestly ill ‑ founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected under Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Declares the application inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 13 April 2023.

Viktoriya Maradudina Mārtiņš Mits Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13

of the Convention

(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy

in domestic law)

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Levels of jurisdiction

45323/20

09/10/2020

Dmytro Leonidovych BEVZA

1976Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych

Limoges

08/09/2014

15/04/2016

22/10/2014

19/07/2021

5 years and 4 months and 20 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255