Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MASELKO v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 52086/13 • ECHR ID: 001-225700

Document date: June 1, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

MASELKO v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 52086/13 • ECHR ID: 001-225700

Document date: June 1, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 52086/13 Roman Anatoliyovych MASELKO against Ukraine

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 1 June 2023 as a Committee composed of:

Carlo Ranzoni, President , Lado Chanturia, María Elósegui , judges ,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 7 August 2013,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant’s details are set out in the appended table.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”).

THE LAW

The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 of the Convention are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings was not excessive or unreasonable (for further details see the appended table).

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

The applicant also complained under Article 13 of the Convention.

The Court has declared the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 inadmissible. Accordingly, the applicant did not have an “arguable claim” of a violation of a substantive Convention provision and, therefore, Article 13 of the Convention is inapplicable to this part of the application.

It follows that the complaint under Article 13 must also be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Declares the application inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 22 June 2023.

Viktoriya Maradudina Carlo Ranzoni Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention

(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Levels of jurisdiction

52086/13

07/08/2013

Roman Anatoliyovych MASELKO

1979First set of the proceedings

22/10/2007

Second set of the proceedings

19/11/2007

First set of the proceedings

01/10/2013

Second set of the proceedings

13/02/2013

5 years and 11 months and 10 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

5 years and 2 months and 25 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255