Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA-SANDSTRÖM
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 189/87 of 22 January 1987 introducing a countervailing charge on apples originating in Poland
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013. European Commission v Czech Republic.
AFFAIRE GARRIDO HERRERO c. ESPAGNEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RAVARANI
CASE OF Y.Y. v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS, JOINED BY JUDGE KŪRIS
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1583/86 of 23 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3103/76 on aid for durum wheat
CASE OF AUGUSTO v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BURANDO HOLDING B.V. AND PORT INVEST v. THE NETHERLANDS

Doc ref: 3124/16;3205/16 • ECHR ID: 001-224734

Document date: May 16, 2023

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

Separate Opinions

Browse separate opinions available for this document.

JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES GROZEV, PAVLI AND KTISTAKIS

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846