Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

GAMMER v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 49652/22 • ECHR ID: 001-226182

Document date: July 4, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

GAMMER v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 49652/22 • ECHR ID: 001-226182

Document date: July 4, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 24 July 2023

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 49652/22 Pavel GAMMER against Estonia lodged on 12 October 2022 communicated on 4 July 2023

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the length of pre-trial detention.

The applicant was accused of several criminal offences. He was taken in custody on 13 February 2018 and a court order for his detention was issued on 14 February 2018. His detention was repeatedly extended during the pre-trial stage of the proceedings and during the trial stage the courts repeatedly verified the continued need to detain him. At the time of lodging his application with the Court on 12 October 2022, the applicant remained in detention.

He complains that his excessively long pre-trial detention is in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Was the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Lisovskij v. Lithuania , no. 36249/14, §§ 74-80, 2 May 2017; Chyła v. Poland , no. 8384/08, §§ 115-23, 3 November 2015; Trifković v. Croatia , no. 36653/09, § 121, 6 November 2012; and, in the same vein, Abuladze v. Estonia [Committee], no. 12928/20, §§ 15-29, 24 January 2023)? In particular, did the domestic courts provide relevant and sufficient reasons justifying the applicant’s continued detention, did the competent authorities consider alternative preventive measures and display special diligence in the conduct of the criminal proceedings against the applicant, as required under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?

2. The applicant is invited to submit court judgments concerning the possible appeals he lodged against the decisions to either prolong his pre-trial detention or to consider his continued pre-trial detention justified.

The parties are also asked to submit other documents relevant to the progress of the proceedings in question.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846