KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications
Doc ref: 44850/18 • ECHR ID: 001-226174
Document date: June 29, 2023
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Published on 24 July 2023
FIFTH SECTION
Application no. 44850/18 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) against Russia and 27 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth/registration
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
44850/18*
11/09/2018
Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO)
1984Rally against falsification of presidential elections
St Petersburg
28/01/2018
Rally against the war in Ukraine
St Petersburg
03/03/2022
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days (art. 19.3 § 1), fine of RUB 15,000 (art. 20.2 § 5)
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court, 16/03/2018 and
19/04/2018
St Petersburg City Court
05/04/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€:
- from 07.00 p.m. on 13/03/2018 to 14/03/2028, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case,
- from 07.30 p.m. on 03/03/2022 to 04/03/2022, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 16/03/2018, 19/04/2018 and 05/04/2022;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of the proceedings in 2022);
Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - administrative conviction under Art. 5.12 § 1 of CAO (production or dissemination of printed, audio-visual or other campaigning material in breach of the electoral legislation) for distribution of leaflets against elections on 10/02/2018; fine of RUB 1,000; final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 14/05/2018;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 14/03/2018 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - the applicant was convicted twice for participation in the same public event of 28/01/2018: under art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO (administrative detention), and under art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO (fine)
52954/18*
25/10/2018
Aleksey Sergeyevich BELOZEROV
1988Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk
St Petersburg
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
05/05/2018
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
administrative detention of 15 days, and fine of RUB 170,000
St Petersburg City Court, 16/05/2018 and
18/05/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€:
- from 12/06/2017 to 14/06/2017, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case (raised in the compensation proceedings following the quashing of the applicant’s administrative conviction under art. 19.3 of the CAO),
- from 04.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 (the applicant spent more than 4 hours in the police van) to 06/05/2018, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 16/05/2018 and 18/05/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based
(in respect of the proceedings related to the public event in 2018);
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - The applicant was convicted twice - under art. 19.3 (administrative detention) and under art. 20.2 § 8 (administrative detention and fine) of the CAO for his participation in the same public event of 05/05/2018.
56135/18*
25/10/2018
Andrey Andreyevich GRAF
1991Rally against Mr Putin’s reelection as President
St Petersburg
05/05/2018
Anti-government rally
St Petersburg
07/10/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
administrative detention of 15 days
St Petersburg City Court
26/07/2018
St Petersburg City Court
11/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 04.15 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 09.15 a.m. on 06/05/2018.
Following the discontinuation of the proceedings under art. 19.3 of CAO, the applicant brought compensation proceedings and was granted RUB 3,000 (EUR 34). Final decision: 24/12/2020, Supreme Court of Russia;
Art. 6 (1) - Independent and impartial tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 24/07/2018 and of 11/10/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of administrative-offence proceedings which ended with the final decision of the St Petersburg City Court of 24/07/2018 and of 11/10/2018).
25403/19*
23/04/2019
Aleksey Nikolayevich NIKITIN
1969Rally against pension reform
Krasnodar
09/09/2018
"Stroll"/rally against raising prices for public transport (14 participants)
Krasnodar
24/12/2018
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Krasnodar
31/01/2021
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
administrative detention of 5 days
administrative detention of 5 days
fine of RUB 20,000
Krasnodar Regional Court, decision adopted on 25/09/2018
in the applicant’s absence and served on him on 26/10/2018
Krasnodar Regional Court
06/02/2019
Krasnodar Regional Court
09/12/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 6.00 p.m. on 26/12/2018 to at least 2.00 p.m. on 27/12/2018, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Krasnodar Regional Court, 25/09/2018, 06/02/2019 and 06/03/2019;
Art. 6 (1) - absence of the applicant from his proceedings - The applicant came to the appeal hearing scheduled on 25/09/2018. He waited for 6 hours in front of the judge’s office, in vain, he was never called. On 26/09/2018 he complained to the president of the tribunal. By a letter of 26/10/2018, the Krasnodar Regional Court answered that the appeal decision was adopted on 25/09/2018. There is no indication in this decision about the applicant’s absence or presence;
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators – The applicant held a solo picket against raising prices for public transport, in Krasnodar, on 20/12/2018. He was convicted under art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO to a fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 06/03/2019;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
28534/21*
02/06/2021
Vadim Vilyevich KHAYRULLIN
1972Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalny
Kaliningrad
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 5 days
Kaliningrad Region Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021, until the hearing on the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Kaliningrad Region Court,
11/02/2021 and 23/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of the administrative offence proceedings related to the applicant’s solo picket on 29/08/2020);
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators – The applicant held a solo picket in support of Belarus on 29/08/2020 in Kaliningrad. He was convicted under art. 20.2 § 5 of the CAO and fined to RUB 20,000. final decision: Kaliningrad Regional Court, 23/03/2021.
28773/21*
11/05/2021
Dmitriy Viktorovich TOLMACHEV
1970Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets
Tbilisi, Georgia
Political rally
Irkutsk
31/01/2021
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Irkutsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
administrative detention of 9 days
Irkutsk Regional Court
23/09/2021
Irkutsk Regional Court
29/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Irkutsk Regional Court, 23/09/2021 and 29/04/2021
29826/21*
21/05/2021
Gleb Maksimovich SHIN
1998Yevgeniy Vladislavovich Sokolov
Belgorod
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Belgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community works of 20 hours
Belgorod Regional Court
15/03/2021
30438/21*
15/05/2021
Boris Yulyevich KAGARLITSKIY
1958Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov
Podolsk
Rally against the constitutional amendments
Moscow
15/07/2020
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
16/11/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 8.30 p.m. on 15/07/2020 to 2.30 a.m. on 16/07/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/11/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
31692/21*
07/06/2021
Ramazan Ramazanovich RADZHABOV
1998Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 4.51 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 1.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/03/2021.
32169/21
11/06/2021
Andrey Ramilevich BOYKO
1990Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 10.08 a.m. to 4.35 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
32719/21*
14/06/2021
Konstantin Olegovich DYDZINSKIY
1975Rally (collection of signatures) against constitutional amendments
Moscow
15/07/2020
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 200,000
Moscow City Court
14/12/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 10.00 p.m. on 15/07/2020 to 4.30 a.m. on 16/07/2020, while the said record was drawn up only on 30/07/2020.
32752/21*
01/06/2021
Kamil Ramilevich GALEYEV
1992Polina Sergeyevna Kurakina
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/020/2021;
Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of the rally and his subsequent conviction.
33306/21
13/06/2021
Anton Ivanovich SORVACHEV
1982Petr Viktorovich BORKOV
1986Petr Viktorovich SHVAREV
1993Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fines of RUB 10,000, 17,000 and 10,000 respectively
Supreme Court the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021, 07/04/2021 and
07/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021, 07/04/2021 and 07/04/2021.
33456/21*
01/06/2021
Dmitriy Nikolayevich SKURIKHIN
1974Anton Sergeyevich Grachev
Gatchina
Commemoration of Boris Nemtsov
St Petersburg
29/02/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/12/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, in the morning on 23/01/2023 (in order to prevent the applicant’s participation in the rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy), then from 07.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, and impossibility to adduce evidence on an equal foot with the prosecution (all sets of the proceedings);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021 and 05/07/2022;
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction for having made calls on 17/01/2021 to participate in an unauthorised public event in support of Mr A. Navalnyy scheduled for 23/01/2021, art. 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 20 days. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021;
Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - On 06/03/2022 the applicant held a solo picket in St Petersburg against the war in Ukraine. He was convicted under art. 20.3.3 § 1 of the CAO (discreditation of the Russian army) and fined RUB 45,000. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 05/07/2022.
33806/21
03/06/2021
Aleksandr Vladimirovich BOGOMAZ
1976Andrey Vasilyevich Sabinin
Stavropol
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Smolensk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 14,000
Smolensk Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 2.00 to 5.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021; no evidence that the record could not have been drawn on the spot;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Smolensk Regional Court, 17/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution.
34091/21*
06/06/2021
Albina Romanovna YANOVA
1993Dmitriy Vladimirovich Zubarev
Vladivostok
Rally in support of MR A. Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Primorye Regional Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.56 to 10.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: 20/04/2021, Primorye Regional Court;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35049/21
25/06/2021
Pavel Yuryevich TEMNIKOV
1986Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/05/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35139/21*
25/06/2021
Dmitriy Andreyevich SKIRTA
1997Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 3 days
Moscow City Court
08/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.30 a.m. to 9.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 08/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35140/21*
25/06/2021
Kirill Aleksandrovich KARPOV
1992Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.00 to; 11.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/05/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution.
35144/21*
25/06/2021
Georgiy Andreyevich SAPOZHNIKOV
1988Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 7.00 p.m. on 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35147/21
25/06/2021
Anna Yuryevna KUTSENKO
2001Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.00 a.m. to 4.10 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35165/21*
25/06/2021
Dmitriy Vladimirovich LUKIN
1996Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 10.30 a.m. to 05.10 p.m. on 02/02/2021; the applicant spent 2h30 in the police van;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35166/21
25/06/2021
Oleg Anatolyevich MAKAYEV
1989Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.30 to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based
35188/21*
18/06/2021
Sergey Aleksandrovich ANDREYEV
1975Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
18/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.00 p.m. 23/01/2021 to 7.00 p.m. on 25/01/2021, until the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
35688/21
02/07/2021
Aleksey Aleksandrovich GRUZDEV
1972Yelena Viktorovna Kurochko
Vologda
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Vologda
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Vologda Regional Court
11/03/2021
35818/21*
27/06/2021
Sergey Mikhaylovich SKVORTSOV
1990Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo
Barnaul
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Lipetsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 2:00 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Lipetsk Regional Court, 18/03/2021.
35843/21*
31/05/2021
Vadim Dmitriyevich BORODIN
1960Deceased in 2022
Rally in support of MR A. Navalnyy
Magnitogorsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Chelyabinsk Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
36391/21*
07/07/2021
Yana Igorevna TEPLITSKAYA
1991Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova
Moscow
Rally in support of the persons accused in the "Set " criminal case
St Petersburg
22/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
02/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.45 a.m. to 10.20 p.m. on 22/06/2020, no record of the applicant’s detention was drawn up;
Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.