Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

Doc ref: 44850/18 • ECHR ID: 001-226174

Document date: June 29, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

Doc ref: 44850/18 • ECHR ID: 001-226174

Document date: June 29, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 24 July 2023

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 44850/18 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) against Russia and 27 other applications

(see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.

In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth/registration

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

44850/18*

11/09/2018

Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO)

1984Rally against falsification of presidential elections

St Petersburg

28/01/2018

Rally against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

03/03/2022

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative detention of 10 days (art. 19.3 § 1), fine of RUB 15,000 (art. 20.2 § 5)

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court, 16/03/2018 and

19/04/2018

St Petersburg City Court

05/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 07.00 p.m. on 13/03/2018 to 14/03/2028, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case,

- from 07.30 p.m. on 03/03/2022 to 04/03/2022, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 16/03/2018, 19/04/2018 and 05/04/2022;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of the proceedings in 2022);

Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - administrative conviction under Art. 5.12 § 1 of CAO (production or dissemination of printed, audio-visual or other campaigning material in breach of the electoral legislation) for distribution of leaflets against elections on 10/02/2018; fine of RUB 1,000; final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 14/05/2018;

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 14/03/2018 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;

Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - the applicant was convicted twice for participation in the same public event of 28/01/2018: under art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO (administrative detention), and under art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO (fine)

52954/18*

25/10/2018

Aleksey Sergeyevich BELOZEROV

1988Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Peredruk

St Petersburg

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg

05/05/2018

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

administrative detention of 15 days, and fine of RUB 170,000

St Petersburg City Court, 16/05/2018 and

18/05/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 12/06/2017 to 14/06/2017, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case (raised in the compensation proceedings following the quashing of the applicant’s administrative conviction under art. 19.3 of the CAO),

- from 04.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 (the applicant spent more than 4 hours in the police van) to 06/05/2018, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 16/05/2018 and 18/05/2018;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

(in respect of the proceedings related to the public event in 2018);

Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - The applicant was convicted twice - under art. 19.3 (administrative detention) and under art. 20.2 § 8 (administrative detention and fine) of the CAO for his participation in the same public event of 05/05/2018.

56135/18*

25/10/2018

Andrey Andreyevich GRAF

1991Rally against Mr Putin’s reelection as President

St Petersburg

05/05/2018

Anti-government rally

St Petersburg

07/10/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

administrative detention of 15 days

St Petersburg City Court

26/07/2018

St Petersburg City Court

11/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.15 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 09.15 a.m. on 06/05/2018.

Following the discontinuation of the proceedings under art. 19.3 of CAO, the applicant brought compensation proceedings and was granted RUB 3,000 (EUR 34). Final decision: 24/12/2020, Supreme Court of Russia;

Art. 6 (1) - Independent and impartial tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 24/07/2018 and of 11/10/2018;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of administrative-offence proceedings which ended with the final decision of the St Petersburg City Court of 24/07/2018 and of 11/10/2018).

25403/19*

23/04/2019

Aleksey Nikolayevich NIKITIN

1969Rally against pension reform

Krasnodar

09/09/2018

"Stroll"/rally against raising prices for public transport (14 participants)

Krasnodar

24/12/2018

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Krasnodar

31/01/2021

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

administrative detention of 5 days

administrative detention of 5 days

fine of RUB 20,000

Krasnodar Regional Court, decision adopted on 25/09/2018

in the applicant’s absence and served on him on 26/10/2018

Krasnodar Regional Court

06/02/2019

Krasnodar Regional Court

09/12/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 p.m. on 26/12/2018 to at least 2.00 p.m. on 27/12/2018, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Krasnodar Regional Court, 25/09/2018, 06/02/2019 and 06/03/2019;

Art. 6 (1) - absence of the applicant from his proceedings - The applicant came to the appeal hearing scheduled on 25/09/2018. He waited for 6 hours in front of the judge’s office, in vain, he was never called. On 26/09/2018 he complained to the president of the tribunal. By a letter of 26/10/2018, the Krasnodar Regional Court answered that the appeal decision was adopted on 25/09/2018. There is no indication in this decision about the applicant’s absence or presence;

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators – The applicant held a solo picket against raising prices for public transport, in Krasnodar, on 20/12/2018. He was convicted under art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO to a fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 06/03/2019;

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

28534/21*

02/06/2021

Vadim Vilyevich KHAYRULLIN

1972Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalny

Kaliningrad

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative detention of 5 days

Kaliningrad Region Court

11/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021, until the hearing on the applicant’s administrative-offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Kaliningrad Region Court,

11/02/2021 and 23/03/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (in respect of the administrative offence proceedings related to the applicant’s solo picket on 29/08/2020);

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators – The applicant held a solo picket in support of Belarus on 29/08/2020 in Kaliningrad. He was convicted under art. 20.2 § 5 of the CAO and fined to RUB 20,000. final decision: Kaliningrad Regional Court, 23/03/2021.

28773/21*

11/05/2021

Dmitriy Viktorovich TOLMACHEV

1970Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets

Tbilisi, Georgia

Political rally

Irkutsk

31/01/2021

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Irkutsk

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

administrative detention of 9 days

Irkutsk Regional Court

23/09/2021

Irkutsk Regional Court

29/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Irkutsk Regional Court, 23/09/2021 and 29/04/2021

29826/21*

21/05/2021

Gleb Maksimovich SHIN

1998Yevgeniy Vladislavovich Sokolov

Belgorod

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Belgorod

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community works of 20 hours

Belgorod Regional Court

15/03/2021

30438/21*

15/05/2021

Boris Yulyevich KAGARLITSKIY

1958Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov

Podolsk

Rally against the constitutional amendments

Moscow

15/07/2020

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

16/11/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 15/07/2020 to 2.30 a.m. on 16/07/2020;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/11/2020;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

31692/21*

07/06/2021

Ramazan Ramazanovich RADZHABOV

1998Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

16/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 4.51 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 1.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/03/2021.

32169/21

11/06/2021

Andrey Ramilevich BOYKO

1990Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

28/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.08 a.m. to 4.35 p.m. on 02/02/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/04/2021;

Art. 6 (1) and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

32719/21*

14/06/2021

Konstantin Olegovich DYDZINSKIY

1975Rally (collection of signatures) against constitutional amendments

Moscow

15/07/2020

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 200,000

Moscow City Court

14/12/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.00 p.m. on 15/07/2020 to 4.30 a.m. on 16/07/2020, while the said record was drawn up only on 30/07/2020.

32752/21*

01/06/2021

Kamil Ramilevich GALEYEV

1992Polina Sergeyevna Kurakina

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative detention of 10 days

Moscow City Court

05/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/020/2021;

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of the rally and his subsequent conviction.

33306/21

13/06/2021

Anton Ivanovich SORVACHEV

1982Petr Viktorovich BORKOV

1986Petr Viktorovich SHVAREV

1993Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak

Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Syktyvkar

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fines of RUB 10,000, 17,000 and 10,000 respectively

Supreme Court the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021, 07/04/2021 and

07/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 31/03/2021, 07/04/2021 and 07/04/2021.

33456/21*

01/06/2021

Dmitriy Nikolayevich SKURIKHIN

1974Anton Sergeyevich Grachev

Gatchina

Commemoration of Boris Nemtsov

St Petersburg

29/02/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

01/12/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, in the morning on 23/01/2023 (in order to prevent the applicant’s participation in the rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy), then from 07.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers and other witnesses on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, and impossibility to adduce evidence on an equal foot with the prosecution (all sets of the proceedings);

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decisions: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021 and 05/07/2022;

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction for having made calls on 17/01/2021 to participate in an unauthorised public event in support of Mr A. Navalnyy scheduled for 23/01/2021, art. 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 20 days. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021;

Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - On 06/03/2022 the applicant held a solo picket in St Petersburg against the war in Ukraine. He was convicted under art. 20.3.3 § 1 of the CAO (discreditation of the Russian army) and fined RUB 45,000. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 05/07/2022.

33806/21

03/06/2021

Aleksandr Vladimirovich BOGOMAZ

1976Andrey Vasilyevich Sabinin

Stavropol

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Smolensk

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 14,000

Smolensk Regional Court

17/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 2.00 to 5.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021; no evidence that the record could not have been drawn on the spot;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Smolensk Regional Court, 17/03/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution.

34091/21*

06/06/2021

Albina Romanovna YANOVA

1993Dmitriy Vladimirovich Zubarev

Vladivostok

Rally in support of MR A. Navalnyy

Vladivostok

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.56 to 10.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: 20/04/2021, Primorye Regional Court;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35049/21

25/06/2021

Pavel Yuryevich TEMNIKOV

1986Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

21/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/05/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35139/21*

25/06/2021

Dmitriy Andreyevich SKIRTA

1997Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative detention of 3 days

Moscow City Court

08/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.30 a.m. to 9.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 08/04/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35140/21*

25/06/2021

Kirill Aleksandrovich KARPOV

1992Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

19/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.00 to; 11.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/05/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution.

35144/21*

25/06/2021

Georgiy Andreyevich SAPOZHNIKOV

1988Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

10/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 7.00 p.m. on 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/03/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35147/21

25/06/2021

Anna Yuryevna KUTSENKO

2001Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.00 a.m. to 4.10 p.m. on 02/02/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35165/21*

25/06/2021

Dmitriy Vladimirovich LUKIN

1996Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.30 a.m. to 05.10 p.m. on 02/02/2021; the applicant spent 2h30 in the police van;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35166/21

25/06/2021

Oleg Anatolyevich MAKAYEV

1989Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

26/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.30 to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

35188/21*

18/06/2021

Sergey Aleksandrovich ANDREYEV

1975Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

18/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.00 p.m. 23/01/2021 to 7.00 p.m. on 25/01/2021, until the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/02/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

35688/21

02/07/2021

Aleksey Aleksandrovich GRUZDEV

1972Yelena Viktorovna Kurochko

Vologda

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Vologda

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Vologda Regional Court

11/03/2021

35818/21*

27/06/2021

Sergey Mikhaylovich SKVORTSOV

1990Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Lipetsk

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Lipetsk Regional Court

18/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 2:00 a.m. on 24/01/2021;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; final decision: Lipetsk Regional Court, 18/03/2021.

35843/21*

31/05/2021

Vadim Dmitriyevich BORODIN

1960Deceased in 2022

Rally in support of MR A. Navalnyy

Magnitogorsk

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Chelyabinsk Regional Court

31/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

36391/21*

07/07/2021

Yana Igorevna TEPLITSKAYA

1991Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova

Moscow

Rally in support of the persons accused in the "Set " criminal case

St Petersburg

22/06/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

02/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 02/02/2021;

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.45 a.m. to 10.20 p.m. on 22/06/2020, no record of the applicant’s detention was drawn up;

Art. 6 (1) - and (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers and other witness on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 393980 • Paragraphs parsed: 42814632 • Citations processed 3216094