Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications

Doc ref: 15326/19 • ECHR ID: 001-226112

Document date: June 29, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications

Doc ref: 15326/19 • ECHR ID: 001-226112

Document date: June 29, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 24 July 2023

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 15326/19 Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK against Russia and 24 other applications

(see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.

In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

15326/19

11/03/2019

Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK

1990Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets

Tbilisi, Georgia

Political rally

Irkutsk

04/05/2018

Rally in support of Navalnyy

Irkutsk

10/10/2020

Article 20.2 § 6 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

fine of RUB 11,000

Irkutsk Regional Court

28/11/2018

Irkutsk Regional Court

03/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Irkutsk Regional Court, 28/11/2018 and 03/03/2021

20684/19*

02/04/2019

Aleksey Aleksandrovich LAVRINENKOV

1982Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov

Novocheboksarsk

Rally against the pension reform

Smolensk

01/07/2018

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Smolensk Regional Court

03/10/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Smolensk Regional Court, 03/10/2018 and 10/10/2018

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction for calling on the public to participate in a rally against the pension reform on 09/09/2018, administrative offence under art. 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 1 day. Final decision: Smolensk Regional Court, 10/10/2018

28028/19*

14/05/2019

Nataliya Mikhaylovna SAVOSKINA

1980Roman Denisovich Kiselyov

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr O. Sentsov

Moscow

18/06/2018

Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

14/11/2018

Moscow City Court

11/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty:

- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 05.00 to 07.20 p.m. on 18/06/2018,

- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 02.20 to 07.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Moscow City Court, 14/11/2018 and 11/05/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction

(in respect of the set of proceedings which ended up with a decision of 11/05/2021)

28491/19*

16/05/2019

Olga Igorevna KUZNETSOVA

1962Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev

Vilnius

“Hybrid” rally against the pension reform

Arkhangelsk

09/09/2018

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Arkhangelsk

23/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

two fines of RUB 14,000 and 15,000, respectively

two fines of RUB 25,000 and 15,000, respectively

Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018 and

29/01/2019

Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 12/03/2021 and

03/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 02.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case,

- unrecorded escorting to a police station on 21/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018, 29/01/2019, 12/03/2021 and 03/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction (in respect of all sets of proceedings)

30007/19*

18/05/2019

Dmitriy Germanovich GUSEV

1976Anton Sergeyevich Grachev

Gatchina

Rally in support of the persons prosecuted in "Novoye Velichiye" and "Set" criminal cases

St Petersburg

28/10/2018

Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

13/12/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 02.40 p.m. on 28/10/2018 to 29/10/2018, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,

- from 09.13 p.m. on 06/08/2019 to 07.00 p.m. on 08/08/2019, the hearings in the applicants administrative-offence case,

- unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - on 03/08/2019 the applicant pronounced a speech during an authorised public rally for fair elections in St Petersburg. On 06/08/2019 he was arrested and escorted to a police station where he was charged with an administrative offence under Art. 20.1 § 1 CAO for having used a swearword in his speech in respect of Mr Putin. He was further convicted to an administrative detention of 10 days. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 14/08/2019

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 8 days for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised public event scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 04/03/2021

37292/19*

24/06/2019

Yegor Mikhaylovich KARASEV

1998Dmitriy Igorevich Zakhvatov

Moscow

Rally against isolation of Russian Internet

Moscow

10/03/2019

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

18/04/2019

Moscow City Court

03/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 12.30 a.m. to 06.00 p.m. on 10/03/2019,

- from 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 08.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/04/2019 and 03/06/2021

39338/19*

12/07/2019

Ilya Vladimirovich KOROBKOV

1986Rally against the pension reform

Yekaterinburg

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

16/01/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018 to 10/09/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 16/01/2019

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

42030/19*

19/07/2019

Boris Vadimovich FEDYUKIN

1989Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev

Vilnius

Rally against the pension reform

Samara

09/09/2018

March in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Samara

21/04/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

fine of RUB 10,000

Samara Regional Court

31/01/2019

Samara Regional Court

20/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 08/11/2018 and on 26/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Samara Regional Court, 31/01/2019 and 20/07/2021

42221/19*

16/07/2019

Viktor Romanovich KAZANTSEV

2000Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin

Krasnoyarsk

Rally against Mr Putin’s re ‑ election as President

Krasnoyarsk

05/05/2018

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Krasnoyarsk

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

fine of RUB 20,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

17/01/2019

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty:

- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 09.00 p.m. on 05/05/2018, while the said record was drawn up only on 15/05/2018,

- unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,

- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.20 to 10.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 12/02/2021

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, fine of RUB 20,000 for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy. Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (in respect of the proceedings related to calls and those related to the rally on 31/01/2021) – final decisions: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021 and 20/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

(in respect of the proceedings which ended with the final decision of 20/04/2021)

42683/19*

08/08/2019

Dmitriy Gennadyevich GUDKOV

1980Yuliya Fedotova

Yekaterinburg

Rally in support of fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

14/07/2019

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative detention of 30 days

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

01/08/2019

Moscow City Court

29/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”,

- from 02.55 to 05.55 p.m. on 27/07/2019,

- from 03.30 p.m. on 28/07/2019 to 05.13 p.m. on 30/07/2019, hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 01/08/2019, 04/10/2019 and 29/09/2021

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 10 days, for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 27/07/2019 for fair elections to Mosgorduma. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/10/2019

10059/21*

16/02/2021

Maksim Ruslanovich KONYUKHOV

1990Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative detention of 15 days (partly exempted for health reasons on appeal by the Moscow City Court)

Moscow City Court

05/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2020, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

16344/21

08/03/2021

Nikita Alekseyevich DOBRYNIN

1993Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh

Moscow

Political rally

Moscow

24/03/2020

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

10/09/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 05.30 to 07.20 p.m. on 24/03/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/09/2020

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

24360/21

17/04/2021

Yevgeniya Vladimirovna VAZHENINA

1987Vitaliy Viktorovich Cherkasov

St Petersburg

Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk Region Mr S. Furgal

Khabarovsk

07/11/2020

Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal

Khabarovsk

26/12/2020

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

administrative detention of 9 days

fine of RUB 150,000

Khabarovsk Regional Court

18/11/2020

Khabarovsk Regional Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:

- from 02.00 p.m. on 7/11/2020 to 10.00 a.m. on 09/11/2020,

- from 01.00 p.m. on 15/02/2021 to 16/02/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (proceedings in 2020)

25053/21*

20/04/2021

Aleksandr Vasilyevich VASILYEV

1979Konstantin Vladimirovich Bubon

Khabarovsk

Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal

Khabarovsk

10/10/2020

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

administrative detention of 20 days

Khabarovsk Regional Court

20/10/2020

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

26915/21

08/05/2021

Mikhail Yevgenyevich PARFENYUK

1996Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets

Tbilisi, Georgia

Political rally

Irkutsk

23/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative detention of 10 days

Irkutsk Regional Court

28/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

28225/21*

30/04/2021

Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna KLEPIKOVA

2000Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 13,000

Moscow City Court

11/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 11.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

28370/21

04/05/2021

Lada Sergeyevna SOKOLOVA

2021Political rally

Moscow

29/05/2020

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

06/11/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention there from 04.35 to 07.20 p.m. on 29/05/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

28581/21*

02/06/2021

Syldys Aleksandrovich KHOMUSHKU

1984Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

22/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.30 to 11.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

31621/21

07/06/2021

Yaroslav Ruslanovich MAYKOV

1990Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

18/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.45 a.m. to 09.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution

31684/21*

07/06/2021

Nikolay Sergeyevich AGAPOV

1993Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 08.25 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 02.40 a.m. on 24/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

32175/21*

11/06/2021

Dmitriy Andreyevich PEREGON

1999Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Vladivostok

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

13/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 03.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 04.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021; the applicant spent more than 4 hours in the police van

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction

32607/21

29/05/2021

Yelena Sergeyvna BEREZHNAYA

1992Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh

Moscow

Environmental rally (march)

Moscow

16/08/2020

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

30/11/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 06.00 to 09.25 p.m. on 16/08/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction

32652/21

29/05/2021

Diana Yevgenyevna BORISEVICH

1997Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh

Moscow

Environmental rally (march)

Moscow

16/08/2020

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

04/12/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 06.25 to 09.05 p.m. on 16/08/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction

32654/21

29/05/2021

Aliya Makhmutovna GIZETDINOVA

1992Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh

Moscow

Environmental rally (march)

Moscow

16/08/2020

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

04/12/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 to 9.25 p.m. on 16/08/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution

52100/21*

12/10/2021

Boris Leonidovich KROTOV

1971Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova

Moscow

Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

12/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846