Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MACZYNSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF SIMKO v. HUNGARY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2792/86 of 22 July 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2855/85 as regards the implementing rules for the specimen declaration form for use in trade in goods within the Community
CASE OF VENEMA v. THE NETHERLANDS
D.T. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF W.Z. v. POLAND
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 144/2012 of 16 February 2012 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 June 2003. Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 December 2002. eCopy, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
CASE OF TUNCEL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF B.F. AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

Doc ref: 13258/18;15500/18;57303/18;9078/20 • ECHR ID: 001-225652

Document date: July 4, 2023

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 30

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

9 unique documents citing • d citations total to v paragraphs

Outbound citations

DF unique documents cited • Pu citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846