GRÓB AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Doc ref: 20005/22 • ECHR ID: 001-225375
Document date: May 17, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 20005/22 Ottóné GRÓB and Others against Hungary
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 17 May 2023 as a Committee composed of:
Alena PoláÄková , President , Gilberto Felici, Raffaele Sabato , judges ,
and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 April 2022,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants were represented by Mr I. Barbalics, a lawyer practising in Budapest.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Governmentâ€).
The Court received the friendly-settlement declaration, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 8 June 2023.
Attila Teplán Alena PoláÄková Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings)
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Date of receipt of Government’s declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros) [1]
20005/22
12/04/2022
(34 applicants)
Ottóné GRÓB
1943Péter SMIDELIK
1970Károly ROLLÉDER
1942Sándor REICH
1937Anett BICSKEY
1991Sándor KÖRTVÉLY
1940Ilona POKÓ
1951József HORVÃTH
1950Mária SZŰCS
1980Lászlóné POZSGAI
1934Lászlóné PALKOVICS
1941Sándorné KOVÃCS
1934Gábor BOGLÃRI
1957Tiborné MÃTÉ
1947Józsefné HORVÃTH
1951Ilona SIMON
1946Istvánné MENDLER
1955Mihály OLÃH
1951István KISS
1930Júlia MERÉNYI
1988Marianna MACSUGÃNÉ HEGEDŰS
1955László KÅSZEGI
1928Annamária Katalin SZÉLIG
1951Frigyes BECZÅK
1975István Ferencné KOSZPEK
1933Ferencné VÃRKONYI
1944János Tiborné TÓTH
1965Mária CZÉKMAN
1953Károly KOPÃCS
1966Katalin HORVÃTHNÉ BÃRÓ
1980ErnÅ‘né BÃRÓ
1955Imre MÃTÉ
1941Ferenc MEGYES
1947György Ferenc HORVÃTH
1930Barbalics István
Budapest
11/04/2023
31/01/2023
9,100
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants .
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
